On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Randy Kobes wrote:
I'm currently rebuilding everything with VC 8 (the free
version), and will report on that later.
Yea - I discovered it's quite impossible to get msvcrt-linked activestate
to cooperate with openssl compiled against msvcr80, a
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd especially appreciate any input from Tom w.r.t. the ease of adding
APR_NO_FILE flags to apr_procattr_io_set() members whom are not allowed
to have a handle at all, eg. how this works out with mod_fcgid and similar
modules.
The proposed patch works correctly with
Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> The patched version built fine, and with the svn mod_perl2
> sources, and perl-5.8.8 (ActivePerl 822), all the mp2
> tests passed using VC++ 6. Great work!
FYI I'm waiting on a third set of eyeballs before this is all committed.
I'd especially appreciate any input from Tom
Randy Kobes wrote:
>
> I'm currently rebuilding everything with VC 8 (the free
> version), and will report on that later.
Yea - I discovered it's quite impossible to get msvcrt-linked activestate
to cooperate with openssl compiled against msvcr80, and probably not against
httpd+mod_perl against m
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/apr-1.x-win32-nohandle.patch
FYI - that one does not apply cleanly to apr-1.2 (it's trunk)
if you want the easily applied flavor, that would be;
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/apr-1.2-win32-nohandle.patch
The h
> http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/apr-1.x-win32-nohandle.patch
FYI - that one does not apply cleanly to apr-1.2 (it's trunk)
if you want the easily applied flavor, that would be;
http://people.apache.org/~wrowe/apr-1.2-win32-nohandle.patch
The httpd patch applies with little pain.
