On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 10:19:31 +0200
Torsten Foertsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am asking because I have had FAIL reports from CPAN testers that don't
> install ModPerl::MM. The way around these reports is using
> BEGIN {
> eval {
> require ModPerl::MM;
> require Apache::TestMM;
> };
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused about what MakeMaker is best to use with mp2 modules.
There is the good old ExtUtils::MakeMaker that is mentioned in
http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/testing/testing.html. How I got there I
don't remember but I have us
Torsten Foertsch wrote:
Hi,
I am a bit confused about what MakeMaker is best to use with mp2 modules.
There is the good old ExtUtils::MakeMaker that is mentioned in
http://perl.apache.org/docs/general/testing/testing.html. How I got there I
don't remember but I have used in all my modules M
On Dec 28, 2004, at 2:36 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Probably vice versa. It looks that Apache::TestMM does more than it
should be doing. It should be handling only test/clean parts.
Ah, and I just copied what was there to create Apache::TestMB.
so you will be asking, right?
Oh, okay, but not today. To
Perrin Harkins wrote:
I'd like to put in a request at this point that no one use Module::Build
for any mod_perl-related stuff until it comes with perl. I like Ken's
work on it, and I appreciate how Module::Build makes interactive installs
easier to write, but I don't want to ask people to install
I'd like to put in a request at this point that no one use Module::Build
for any mod_perl-related stuff until it comes with perl. I like Ken's
work on it, and I appreciate how Module::Build makes interactive installs
easier to write, but I don't want to ask people to install another module
in orde
David Wheeler wrote:
On Dec 28, 2004, at 2:17 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
why Apache::TestMB? It should be ModPerl::MB when it'll appear, right?
Up to you. I used it as an example because I don't really understand
how Apache::TestMM and ModPerl::MM interact.
Apache::TestMM is onl
On Dec 28, 2004, at 2:17 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
why Apache::TestMB? It should be ModPerl::MB when it'll appear,
right?
Up to you. I used it as an example because I don't really understand
how Apache::TestMM and ModPerl::MM interact.
Apache::TestMM is only needed only to add
David Wheeler wrote:
why Apache::TestMB? It should be ModPerl::MB when it'll appear, right?
Up to you. I used it as an example because I don't really understand
how Apache::TestMM and ModPerl::MM interact.
Apache::TestMM is only needed only to add 'make test' and adjust 'make
clean' targets.
w
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:53 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
'perl' => 6.006,
perl 6? :)
Oops. :-)
why Apache::TestMB? It should be ModPerl::MB when it'll appear, right?
Up to you. I used it as an example because I don't really understand
how Apache::TestMM and ModPerl::MM interact.
why the fall
what if none exists, should Module::Install be used to require
Module::Build?
that's a tricky one. If ModPerl::MB is added, I suppose a Build.PL writer
should still manually require Module::Build (version) and probably ensure
that it's installed via Module::Install, correct? Then ModPerl::MB co
David Wheeler wrote:
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
it can't be any simpler:
That wasn't the whole script, but I found it on search.cpan.org. Here's
how to get it working with Module::Build right now:
use strict;
use warnings FATAL => 'all';
use Apache2;
>
use Apache::TestMB;
#
On Dec 28, 2004, at 1:26 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
it can't be any simpler:
That wasn't the whole script, but I found it on search.cpan.org. Here's
how to get it working with Module::Build right now:
use strict;
use warnings FATAL => 'all';
use Apache2;
use Apache::TestMB;
# prerequisites
my %requir
David Wheeler wrote:
On Dec 28, 2004, at 12:58 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
And if we do it the other way around, so you could take
Apache-Filter-HTTPHeadersFixup (the latest is on cpan) add a plain
Build.PL (as if there was no mp2) and then we can add the needed
strings and design ModPerl::MB on the w
On Dec 28, 2004, at 12:58 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
And if we do it the other way around, so you could take
Apache-Filter-HTTPHeadersFixup (the latest is on cpan) add a plain
Build.PL (as if there was no mp2) and then we can add the needed
strings and design ModPerl::MB on the way?
Yes, that should
[disconnect this thread from the unrelated noise]
David Wheeler wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2004, at 8:17 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
>> Why not? I'm not familiar with Module::Build, but doesn't it make
>> possible to subclass itself? Of course ModPerl::MB is only needed if
>> there are 3rd party mp2 modules
On Dec 28, 2004, at 8:17 AM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Why not? I'm not familiar with Module::Build, but doesn't it make
possible to subclass itself? Of course ModPerl::MB is only needed if
there are 3rd party mp2 modules that use M::B. Are there any? May be
David could write a skeleton for a dummy mod
Geoffrey Young wrote:
at any rate, it's a
big win for people writing mp2 stuff for CPAN, and I can see how M::B folks
could take advantage of a similar tool. however, stas is right, that tool
should be distributed with mp2 core so that developers have access to it.
of course, once that's done we
18 matches
Mail list logo
