On 2004-02-29, Cees Hek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> What version of CGI.pm are you testing with? There are some known
> problems with using CGI.pm and mod_perl in older versions of CGI.pm.
> Upgrade to the latest version of CGI.pm and my guess is your problem
> will go away.
Cees
Hi Mark,
What version of CGI.pm are you testing with? There are some known
problems with using CGI.pm and mod_perl in older versions of CGI.pm.
Upgrade to the latest version of CGI.pm and my guess is your problem
will go away.
Cheers,
Cees
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Hello,
I maintain the popular
On 2004-02-28, sagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried using Apache::Request instead of CGI?. It also has a
> similar API to CGI, and if youre running mod_perl, you should be using
> Apache::Request :)
>
> Check out:
> http://search.cpan.org/~joesuf/libapreq-1.3/Request/Request.pm
I'm awa
Have you tried using Apache::Request instead of CGI?. It also has a
similar API to CGI, and if youre running mod_perl, you should be using
Apache::Request :)
Check out:
http://search.cpan.org/~joesuf/libapreq-1.3/Request/Request.pm
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
