Thanks for the help!
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wiles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 3:44 PM
To: Reese,Richard Stephen
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache::Server not included in mod_perl-1.99_16-4
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:03:28 -0400
"
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:03:28 -0400
"Reese,Richard Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great thanks for help on the install.
>
> I've got to do some rewriting because it does seem that many of the
> values have been rewritten as mentioned before.
>
> use ModPerl::Util (); #for CORE::GLOBAL::ex
on';
use GatorLink::ModAuth2 ();
Could you suggest an appropriate list to get help with this?
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wiles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 1:39 PM
To: Reese,Richard Stephen
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache::Server not
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:34:53 -0400
"Reese,Richard Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I feel pretty useless right now ;)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_perl-2.0.2]# ls /usr/sbin/ap*
> /usr/sbin/apachectl /usr/sbin/apmd
>
> no sign of the apxs binary
Sorry, I didn't realize it was in another RPM
: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache::Server not included in mod_perl-1.99_16-4
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:27:07 -0400
"Reese,Richard Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to install mod_perl using source but it wanted apxs.
>
> Simple install:
>
> % perl
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 13:27:07 -0400
"Reese,Richard Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to install mod_perl using source but it wanted apxs.
>
> Simple install:
>
> % perl Makefile.PL MP_APXS=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs
> % make && make test
> % make install
>
> Apache is also inst
nstalled from source. So is building
everything from source the only way to add support for mod_perl?
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wiles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 12:55 PM
To: Reese,Richard Stephen
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache::Server no
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:36:08 -0400
"Reese,Richard Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I put in a request to have it looked at as a bug though once again I'm
> not sure if this is the corect procedure for getting redhat to fix an
> issue in a enterprise product.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzi
to migrate.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wiles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache::Server not included in mod_perl-1.99_16-4
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:11:24 -0400
Kurt Hansen <[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:11:24 -0400
Kurt Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
>
> >Thank you for the information, it just stinks that Redhat would use
> >something that old in their latest OS offering because I'd rather not
> >manually build it
> >
> >
> It's a long-
Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
Thank you for the information, it just stinks that Redhat would use
something that old in their latest OS offering because I'd rather not
manually build it
It's a long-standing problem. This history recently posted to the CentOS
mailing list:
"I think you are
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
Thank you for the information, it just stinks that Redhat would use
something that old in their latest OS offering because I'd rather not
manually build it
does anyone know who is handling the redhat distributio
On Jun 6, 2006, at 2:33 PM, Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
Thank you for the information, it just stinks that Redhat would use
something that old in their latest OS offering because I'd rather not
manually build it
does anyone know who is handling the redhat distribution of this?
aside from it
Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
Thank you for the information, it just stinks that Redhat would use
something that old in their latest OS offering because I'd rather not
manually build it
IDK if this is the proper place to ask this question but here goes.
Here is the contents of my mod_perl.pl f
Tuesday, June 06, 2006 2:22 PM
To: Reese,Richard Stephen
Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache::Server not included in mod_perl-1.99_16-4
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 13:51 -0400, Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
> The issue is mod_perl-1.99_16-4 for RHEL4 doesn't seem to have the
> Apac
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 13:51 -0400, Reese,Richard Stephen wrote:
> The issue is mod_perl-1.99_16-4 for RHEL4 doesn't seem to have the
> Apache/Server.pm file that mod_perl-1.99_09-10.ent includes in RHEL3,
> has there been a replacement or is Apache/Server.pm going to be demoted?
That has been repl
16 matches
Mail list logo
