On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 22:43 +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Ok, but if I will do this, it will overwrite the old mod_perl because I want
> to use it with the same Apache version. Or is it possible to specify
> the --prefix and use the full path including the name of the mod_perl file
> that will b
From: "Richard Kelsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is it possible to have 2 versions of perl that use mod_perl and
libapreq?
>
> Yes. You just need to tell your new perl what path to live in when you
> build it. I think the option is named "PREFIX." Same for apache, and
> make sure you use the righ
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 14:16 -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:53 +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Is it possible to have 2 versions of perl that use mod_perl and libapreq?
Yes. You just need to tell your new perl what path to live in when you
build it. I think the opti
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:53 +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Is it possible to have 2 versions of perl that use mod_perl and libapreq?
Yes. You just need to tell your new perl what path to live in when you
build it. I think the option is named "PREFIX." Same for apache, and
make sure you use th
