Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.09.2004 16:27:50:
>
> Thanks, but these particular 4 tests, were they passed or skipped? I
> suppose passed, since the rule is to skip only for < 2.0.52.
>
k714% make test TEST_VERBOSE=1 \
> TEST_FILES="t/filter/both_str_con_add.t t/protocol/echo_bloc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.09.2004 02:51:13:
OK, Apache 2.0.52 is out, could you please report that these tests pass
with that version (unpatched!) and the current modperl-2.0 cvs?
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t t/protocol/echo_block.t
t/protocol/echo_filt
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 29.09.2004 02:51:13:
> OK, Apache 2.0.52 is out, could you please report that these tests pass
> with that version (unpatched!) and the current modperl-2.0 cvs?
>
> t/filter/both_str_con_add.t t/protocol/echo_block.t
> t/protocol/echo_filter.t t/protocol
OK, Apache 2.0.52 is out, could you please report that these tests pass
with that version (unpatched!) and the current modperl-2.0 cvs?
t/filter/both_str_con_add.t t/protocol/echo_block.t
t/protocol/echo_filter.t t/protocol/pseudo_http.t
Please send one report on NetBSD and one more on OpenBSD
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 10:17:34PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Joe, as 2.0.52 is about to be released. Can that fix for NetBSD applied to
> the 0.9 trunch (and head) if it does the trick? Thanks.
It's been in both branches for a while so hopefully it will get picked
up, yep.
joe
--
Report prob
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:15:23PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
So is that the right skip rule (hoping that 2.0.52 will fix NetBSD:
my $should_skip =
($^0 eq /^OpenBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.51')) ||
($^0 eq /^NetBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.52'));
That
Sorry -- the APR patch for OpenBSD _did_ make it into the APR that is
tagged for release with 2.0.51.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/build/apr_hints.m4?rev=1.53.2.9&only_with_tag=APACHE_2_0_51&view=auto:
...
*-openbsd*)
APR_ADDTO(CPPFLAGS, [-D_POSIX_THREADS])
# binding
> So is that the right skip rule (hoping that 2.0.52 will fix NetBSD:
>
> my $should_skip =
> ($^0 eq /^OpenBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.51')) ||
> ($^0 eq /^NetBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.52'));
>
> and the tests that need to be skipped are:
>
> t/filter/both_str
Ken Simpson wrote:
Sorry -- the APR patch for OpenBSD _did_ make it into the APR that is
tagged for release with 2.0.51.
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/build/apr_hints.m4?rev=1.53.2.9&only_with_tag=APACHE_2_0_51&view=auto:
...
*-openbsd*)
APR_ADDTO(CPPFLAGS, [-D_POSIX_THREADS])
Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:15:23PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
So is that the right skip rule (hoping that 2.0.52 will fix NetBSD:
my $should_skip =
($^0 eq /^OpenBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.51')) ||
($^0 eq /^NetBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.52'));
of co
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 04:15:23PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> So is that the right skip rule (hoping that 2.0.52 will fix NetBSD:
>
> my $should_skip =
> ($^0 eq /^OpenBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.51')) ||
> ($^0 eq /^NetBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.52'));
That log
Ken Simpson wrote:
So is that the right skip rule (hoping that 2.0.52 will fix NetBSD:
my $should_skip =
($^0 eq /^OpenBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.51')) ||
($^0 eq /^NetBSD$/i && !need_min_apache_version('2.0.52'));
and the tests that need to be skipped are:
t/filter/both_str_con
Joe Orton wrote:
I can try and debug this, I've found a NetBSD machine and reproduced the
failure. ./t/TEST -start-httpd doesn't work from the mod_perl test
suite, is there a way to get that working?
I guess it will take a while to resolve these BSD issues. Meanwhile we
want to release 1.99_17 so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15.09.2004 18:03:35:
Warning: You do not have permissions to install into
/usr/pkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-netbsd at
/usr/pkg/lib/perl5/5.8.4/ExtUtils/Install.pm line 114.
mkdir /usr/pkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-netb
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15.09.2004 18:03:35:
>
>
> > Warning: You do not have permissions to install into
> > /usr/pkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-netbsd at
> > /usr/pkg/lib/perl5/5.8.4/ExtUtils/Install.pm line 114.
> > mkdir /usr/pkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-netbsd/A
Warning: You do not have permissions to install into
/usr/pkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-netbsd at
/usr/pkg/lib/perl5/5.8.4/ExtUtils/Install.pm line 114.
mkdir /usr/pkg/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-netbsd/Apache2: Permission
denied at /usr/pkg/lib/perl5/5.8.4/ExtUtils/Install.pm line 176
> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.09.2004 04:36:59:
>
> > Mea culpa, not sure why it did work for me. I guess my emulation of
apr
> > not having threads didn't work completely. Please try this patch:
> >
> > Index: lib/ModPerl/BuildMM.pm
> > =
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.09.2004 04:36:59:
> Mea culpa, not sure why it did work for me. I guess my emulation of apr
> not having threads didn't work completely. Please try this patch:
>
> Index: lib/ModPerl/BuildMM.pm
>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 05:15:05PM +1000, Carl Brewer wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >Oh well, having found a NetBSD box to testd this myself, the NetBSD
> >fcntl() is being economical with the truth. It doesn't return
> >O_NONBLOCK yet the socket really is non-blocking. I'll put in the
> >suggest
Joe Orton wrote:
Oh well, having found a NetBSD box to testd this myself, the NetBSD
fcntl() is being economical with the truth. It doesn't return
O_NONBLOCK yet the socket really is non-blocking. I'll put in the
suggested apr_hints.m4 change. fun fun
This may be worth bringing to the attention o
Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:40:48PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
k714% ./nonblock
found port: 52984
O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.
This is rather confusing, since it means that apparently the test is
working OK, and O_NONBLOCK is *not* inherited across accept() on NetBSD,
wh
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 05:40:48PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > k714% ./nonblock
> > > found port: 52984
> > > O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.
> >
> > This is rather confusing, since it means that apparently the test is
> > working OK, and O_NONBLOCK is *not* inherited across a
bad wrapping:
/tmp/jorton12/mod_perl-1.99_16/t/lib
/tmp/jorton12/mod_perl-1.99_16/Apache-Test/lib
It should be here: ^^^
/tmp/jorton12/mod_perl-1.99_16/Apache-Test/lib
--
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH ---
Joe Orton wrote:
I can try and debug this, I've found a NetBSD machine and reproduced the
failure. ./t/TEST -start-httpd doesn't work from the mod_perl test
suite, is there a way to get that working?
bash-2.05b$ ./t/TEST -start-httpd
/tmp/jorton12/root/bin/httpd -d /tmp/jorton12/mod_perl-1.99_16/t
I can try and debug this, I've found a NetBSD machine and reproduced the
failure. ./t/TEST -start-httpd doesn't work from the mod_perl test
suite, is there a way to get that working?
bash-2.05b$ ./t/TEST -start-httpd
/tmp/jorton12/root/bin/httpd -d /tmp/jorton12/mod_perl-1.99_16/t -f
/tmp/jorton
Carl Brewer wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Carl Brewer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but make install for modperl-1.99_16 fails with the following:
/usr/pkg/bin/perl -Iblib/lib/Apache2
-I/usr/home/mgorb/mp-test/mod_perl-1.99_16/Apache-Test/lib
-MModPerl::BuildMM -e ModPerl::BuildMM::glue_pod
WrapX
Stas Bekman wrote:
Carl Brewer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but make install for modperl-1.99_16 fails with the following:
/usr/pkg/bin/perl -Iblib/lib/Apache2
-I/usr/home/mgorb/mp-test/mod_perl-1.99_16/Apache-Test/lib
-MModPerl::BuildMM -e ModPerl::BuildMM::glue_pod
WrapXS/APR/ThreadMutex/T
Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 11:38:15AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on
NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do this on
Op
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11.09.2004 04:46:43:
Sorry, it was a different problem. This should fix it. Will commit that
shortly.
Index: t/apr-ext/threadmutex.t
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2
Carl Brewer wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but make install for modperl-1.99_16 fails with the following:
/usr/pkg/bin/perl -Iblib/lib/Apache2
-I/usr/home/mgorb/mp-test/mod_perl-1.99_16/Apache-Test/lib
-MModPerl::BuildMM -e ModPerl::BuildMM::glue_pod
WrapXS/APR/ThreadMutex/ThreadMutex.pm
/usr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but make install for modperl-1.99_16 fails with the following:
/usr/pkg/bin/perl -Iblib/lib/Apache2
-I/usr/home/mgorb/mp-test/mod_perl-1.99_16/Apache-Test/lib
-MModPerl::BuildMM -e ModPerl::BuildMM::glue_pod
WrapXS/APR/ThreadMutex/ThreadMutex.pm
/usr/home/mgorb/mp-test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 13.09.2004 11:14:21:
> Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11.09.2004 04:46:43:
>
> > Sorry, it was a different problem. This should fix it. Will commit
that
> > shortly.
> >
> > Index: t/apr-ext/threadmutex.t
> >
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11.09.2004 04:46:43:
> Sorry, it was a different problem. This should fix it. Will commit that
> shortly.
>
> Index: t/apr-ext/threadmutex.t
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/t/apr-ext/
Sorry, it was a different problem. This should fix it. Will commit that
shortly.
Index: t/apr-ext/threadmutex.t
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/modperl-2.0/t/apr-ext/threadmutex.t,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 threadmutex.t
--- t/a
> > k714% cd /home/mgorb/mp-test/mod_perl-1.99_16/
> > find . | grep ThreadMutex
> > k714% find . | grep ThreadMutex
> > ./xs/APR/ThreadMutex
> > ./xs/APR/ThreadMutex/APR__ThreadMutex.h
> > ./docs/api/APR/ThreadMutex.pod
> > ./WrapXS/APR/ThreadMutex
> > ./WrapXS/APR/ThreadMutex/Makefile.PL
> > ./Wr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
---
t/apr-ext/threadmutex.t2 512 36 200.00% 1-3
Can't locate APR/ThreadMutex.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/h
> >
> > k714% ./nonblock
> > found port: 52984
> > O_NONBLOCK is not set in the child.
>
> This is rather confusing, since it means that apparently the test is
> working OK, and O_NONBLOCK is *not* inherited across accept() on NetBSD,
> which contradicts the behaviour you are seeing.
>
same on n
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2004 3:38 AM
To: Joe Orton
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Simpson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stas
Bekman
Subject: Re: [mp2] NetBSD-1.6.2 modperl 1.99_16 httpd 2.0.51-dev make
test errors
> I was
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 11:38:15AM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on
> > NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
> >
> > and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do t
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:25:03AM -0700, Ken Simpson wrote:
> > I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on
> > NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
> >
> > and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do this on
> I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on
> NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
>
> http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
>
> and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do this on
> OpenBSD too, Ken, for verification)
>
sorry for the dealy -- was away
>
> > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
> >
>
---
> > t/apr-ext/threadmutex.t2 512 36 200.00% 1-3
>
> > Can't locate APR/ThreadMutex.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> > /us
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 03:49:59PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Ken Simpson wrote:
> >>>Ken, Stas, done as advised. The only test which is failing now (and was
> >>>failing before) is:
> >>
> >>Mikhail, Ken, please submit that patch to dev /at/ apr.apache.org
> >>http://apr.apache.org/. Hopefully i
Ken Simpson wrote:
Ken, Stas, done as advised. The only test which is failing now (and was
failing before) is:
Mikhail, Ken, please submit that patch to dev /at/ apr.apache.org
http://apr.apache.org/. Hopefully it'll get into 2.0.51 release. Or may be
it's too late.
The patch has already gone in
> >Ken, Stas, done as advised. The only test which is failing now (and was
> >failing before) is:
>
> Mikhail, Ken, please submit that patch to dev /at/ apr.apache.org
> http://apr.apache.org/. Hopefully it'll get into 2.0.51 release. Or may be
> it's too late.
The patch has already gone into A
> I wasn't surprised this fails on OpenBSD but I am surprised it fails on
> NetBSD. Can you compile and run:
>
> http://www.apache.org/~jorton/nonblock.c
>
> and post the output. (it would be useful if you could do this on
> OpenBSD too, Ken, for verification)
-bash-2.05b$ ./nonblock
connect:
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:58:26AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>I'd put my $5.00 on APR being the cause of this problem. Mikhail, you
> >>will probably need to patch APR when you build Apache. Try this patch,
> >>which I am guessing will work on NetBSD:
I wasn't surpris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd put my $5.00 on APR being the cause of this problem. Mikhail, you
will probably need to patch APR when you build Apache. Try this patch,
which I am guessing will work on NetBSD:
Index: build/apr_hints.m4
=
> I'd put my $5.00 on APR being the cause of this problem. Mikhail, you
> will probably need to patch APR when you build Apache. Try this patch,
> which I am guessing will work on NetBSD:
>
> Index: build/apr_hints.m4
> ===
> RCS fil
> Ken, do you think this is somehow related to your recent patch in apr?
> These tests didn't break before on NetBSD, is that correct, Mikhail?
I'd put my $5.00 on APR being the cause of this problem. Mikhail, you
will probably need to patch APR when you build Apache. Try this patch,
which I am g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried to build mod_perl-1.99_16 on NetBSD-1.6.2 with perl 5.8.4,
httpd-2.0.51-dev (latest snapshot).
mod_perl make test fails. here are the details:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
51 matches
Mail list logo
