> I'm not getting very far with this, Dorian. Neither httpd-dev nor apr-dev
> are taking it anywhere. So at the moment ap_save_brigade is sort of an
> unstable API, so other developers think we shouldn't expose it in the core
> API. So at the moment you have two options:
hm, this is unfortunate
Dorian Taylor wrote:
I'm not getting very far with this, Dorian. Neither httpd-dev nor apr-dev
are taking it anywhere. So at the moment ap_save_brigade is sort of an
unstable API, so other developers think we shouldn't expose it in the core
API. So at the moment you have two options:
hm, this i
Stas Bekman wrote:
Dorian Taylor wrote:
it'd be nice to run a benchmark. I wonder why ap_save_brigade was
marked as ! in the map file. Which normally means it's not going to
be exposed. Did you by chance look at the archives for possible
references to it?
there's a mention of it in the APR::Buc
Dorian Taylor wrote:
it'd be nice to run a benchmark. I wonder why ap_save_brigade was marked
as ! in the map file. Which normally means it's not going to be exposed.
Did you by chance look at the archives for possible references to it?
there's a mention of it in the APR::Bucket manpage. i could
> it'd be nice to run a benchmark. I wonder why ap_save_brigade was marked
> as ! in the map file. Which normally means it's not going to be exposed.
> Did you by chance look at the archives for possible references to it?
there's a mention of it in the APR::Bucket manpage. i couldn't find
anythi
Dorian Taylor wrote:
How is that related?
i think that's some cargo culting that i didn't clean up. that can
be disregarded.
sure
So you think this approach will be faster than flattening bb on each
filter invocation and concatenating the scalar?
honestly i didn't give it any thought. when i wro
> How is that related?
i think that's some cargo culting that i didn't clean up. that can
be disregarded.
> So you think this approach will be faster than flattening bb on each
> filter invocation and concatenating the scalar?
honestly i didn't give it any thought. when i wrote this i just
want
Dorian Taylor wrote:
no tests currently, but there's a module on cpan that uses it.
http://search.cpan.org/~DORIAN/Apache-TrapSubRequest-0.01/
Thanks Dorian, please see comments below.
diff -ur mod_perl-2.0.0-RC4/lib/Apache/Pa
