Oops, sorry. The answer was in your message.
mvh,
#---
# Robert Friberg perl,java,xml,uml,sql,delphi,
# Systemutvecklare c/c++,vb,php,linux,apache
# 0733-839080
#
# Ensofus AB linuxservrar,serverhosting,
# www.ensofus.se inter
Robert Friberg wrote:
Without seeing the backtrace I can't tell whether it's a bug in
Apache::Request or Perl.
And either way, the bug report should go to perl5-porters list?
Only if it's a bug in perl, and not Apache::Request. Post the backtrace here
and we will be able to tell.
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:55 PM
> To: Robert Friberg
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Summary] [Config] Upgrading, Need stable setup
>
>
> Robert Friberg wrote:
> > Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>It's probably a good idea to report those seg
Robert Friberg wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
It's probably a good idea to report those segfaults to the
perl5-porters list.
Please excuse my ignorance but I would have thought the offensive
code was anywhere *except* in the perl interpreter. I was calling
methods on an invalid Apache::Request obj
internetsystem, Miljo Online
#---
> -Original Message-
> From: Stas Bekman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:18 PM
> To: Robert Friberg
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Summary] [Co
Robert Friberg wrote:
Hello All,
Thanks for all the replies. I spent a few hours
yesterday installing RH9 on a new box, upgrading
perl to 5.8.1, installing apache 1.3.28 and modperl
1.29 from source. No problems at all, just followed
the instructions at
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/ins
