Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Debian Apache 2.0.52-3

2005-03-05 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I said: |>> If Debian testing turns out to have this problem, I think that |>> the test should at least be skipped [...] On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:07:36 -0500, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> No. Well, it's your call Stas. I can perfectly live w

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Debian Apache 2.0.52-3

2005-03-04 Thread Damon Buckwalter
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:07:36 -0500, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | Is it possible that you have Apache 2.0.x with some special patches > > | from 2.1.x applied to it? My guess is that this is the case. In > > | which case there is nothing we can do about it, since you aren't > > | ru

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Debian Apache 2.0.52-3

2005-03-04 Thread Stas Bekman
Dominique Quatravaux wrote: [...] | whereas your report says Apache 2.0.52, whereas the error indicates | that you really run Apache 2.1.x. [...] Dominique, did you build | Apache by yourself? No indeed. This is apache2-mpm-prefork 2.0.52-3 from Debian testing, not the latest version in testing ei

Re: [BUG] A few tests fail on RC4/5.6.1/Debian Apache 2.0.52-3

2005-03-04 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stas Bekman wrote: | Take a look at t/apache/content_length_header.t that's where you | can see that httpd 2.1 has changed behavior. True. Search'n-replacing of "have_min_apache_version(2.1)" with "1" cures the problem. | What's confusing is that your s