> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Berg, Eric
> > When I say that Test::Builder/Test::More/etc. are tightly
> > coupled, I'm talking really entwined. In some cases, we have
created a
> > class with a bunch of test-related methods that look through the
symbol
> > table and find methods that =~ m
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Berg, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I say that Test::Builder/Test::More/etc. are tightly coupled, I'm
> talking really entwined. In some cases, we have created a class with a
> bunch of test-related methods that look through the symbol table and
> find meth
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Perrin Harkins
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: Berg, Eric
> Cc: modperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: Re: mod_perl2 + ModPerl::RegistryPrefork +
> Test::Builder = segfault
&
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Berg, Eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many of our core modules contain test methods that are executed during
> our CVS checkin process as regression tests, so we'd have to completely
> redo our regression testing architecture to decouple Test::Builder from
> our co
