Free bitkeeper is gone though, so its not really an option
On Jul 31, 2005, at 1:00 AM, David Christensen wrote:
I wrote:
I was going to say, "watch out for subversion's license" (free only
for free projects with public access; otherwise a paid commercial
license is required), ...
My mista
David Hofmann wrote:
> My company looking at setting up some kind of versioning control software.
...
> I understand just enough to be dangerous with CVS.
I was going to say, "watch out for subversion's license" (free only for free
projects with public access; otherwise a paid commercial license
I really like Subversion
but i'm not too crazy about it without trac.
i don't use trac for ticketing though - i use it for viewing changesets
and versions of files -- its absolutely amazing at that
On 27 Jul 2005, at 17:22, David Hofmann wrote:
My company looking at setting up some kind of versioning control
software. Currently we have about 10 programs. We use Perl or C
depending on the project.
I understand just enough to be dangerous with CVS. Which is the
current suggestion to
David Hofmann wrote:
My company looking at setting up some kind of versioning control
software. Currently we have about 10 programs. We use Perl or C
depending on the project.
Having used PerForce(PERL's system), CVS(FreeBSD/Redhat),
SVN(Apache-ASF,mod_perl) I'm saying SVN is the clear winne
Depends on your team size and your development process.
subversion is pretty good. However, it doesn't do merging
of branches as neatly as I'd like it to. But if you dont
branch too often, it's excellent.
--- David Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My company looking at setting up some kind
Set yourself up with Subversion. It's easy to configure especially if
you are running Apache 2 already and there is an excellent client for
Windows (TortoiseSVN). If you're gung ho, you could even set up trac
for issue tracking. It integrates really well with SVN and is a good
solution for small t
