On Monday, February 21, 2011 18:32:56 Alexander Goller wrote:
> i have a problem compiling mod_perl on CentOS, using perl 5.10.
The problem could have been sorted out on IRC. Alex had used the wrong version
of ExtUtils::Embed.
We can prevent such problems by checking the version with Mod
Hi Philip,
thanks for looking into it. The version i used here is 2.0.6-dev, the -latest
or -current version downloadable from the website. I can pull svn HEAD too and
try that.
The error is happening in 2.0.4 which i tried first, then i downloaded 2.0.5
because i read of 5.10 improvements and
On 2/21/2011 12:32 PM, Alexander Goller wrote:
> Apache2: -
> Apache2::Request : -
> CGI: 3.49
> ExtUtils::MakeMaker: 6.56, 6.56
> LWP: 5.836
> mod_perl : -
> mod_perl2 : -
Can you pull the specific version from mod_perl2.pm?
Can yo
Hi,
i have a problem compiling mod_perl on CentOS, using perl 5.10.
Bug report:
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
Running make:
-c modperl_flags.c && mv modperl_flags.o modperl_flags.lo
gcc -I/usr/src/redhat/BUI
perl repository for Apache 2.2 and perl 5.10.
Or I missed it.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 6:54 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have tried following the usual links at perl.apache.org, CPAN,
> ActiveState, and searched Google, but I am getting a bit confused.
>
> Is there a binary package available for libapreq2 with ActivePerl
> 5.10/Apache 2.2/Win32, and
Hi.
I have tried following the usual links at perl.apache.org, CPAN,
ActiveState, and searched Google, but I am getting a bit confused.
Is there a binary package available for libapreq2 with ActivePerl
5.10/Apache 2.2/Win32, and if yes, where ?
I would have to install this first on a WinXP
Hi Philippe,
(Sorry for the delay with my answer - I'll be quick from now on)
Thank you for your interest to help me with this crasher.
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 22:17:27 -0400, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> On 29/3/09 15:30, Jozef Kosoru wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tested my mod_perl application
On 29/3/09 15:30, Jozef Kosoru wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tested my mod_perl application using following combinations recently:
>
> * Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_apreq2-20051231/2.6.0 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0
> (default Debian Lenny packages, mpm-prefork)
>
> * Apache/2.2.11 (Unix) mod_apreq2-2009
crash is caused by this package.)
Last known working mod_perl combination where my application worked
just fine is:
Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) mod_apreq2-20051231/2.6.0 mod_perl/2.0.3 Perl/v5.8.8
(any older versions also worked with no problems)
and therefore it seems like an upgrade to Perl 5.10 is a p
in site area...done
7 files installed
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Apache-2.2%2C-perl-5.10%2C-Windows-XP%2C-Apache-DBI-cache-tp22669395p22679473.html
Sent from the mod_perl - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks for this. I pretty new at this stuff. I will give it a try.
Andynic.
andynic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have installed on my Windows XP computer:
> Apache 2.2
> Perl 5.10,
> mod_perl 2
> MySql 5.10.
>
> I would like to write a cgi script using a persistent
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:20 PM, andynic wrote:
> I would like to write a cgi script using a persistent database connection.
> I have read that I need
> For database persistent connections:
> http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/dist/Apache-DBI-Cache
No, you don't. You don't need anything other than DBI wit
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:20 PM, andynic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have installed on my Windows XP computer:
> Apache 2.2
> Perl 5.10,
> mod_perl 2
> MySql 5.10.
>
> I would like to write a cgi script using a persistent database connection.
> I have read that
Hi,
I have installed on my Windows XP computer:
Apache 2.2
Perl 5.10,
mod_perl 2
MySql 5.10.
I would like to write a cgi script using a persistent database connection.
I have read that I need
For database persistent connections:
http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/dist/Apache-DBI-Cache
There I find
'use base' directive, but only on automatic
reload, and freshly on perl 5.10, not our previous version of perl 5.8.8!
I determined that when ModPerl::Util::unload_package is used to unload a
package, when it is then re-required in perl 5.10, 'use base' directives
don't
base' directive, but only on automatic
reload, and freshly on perl 5.10, not our previous version of perl 5.8.8!
Are you able to try 5.8.9, its at least a smaller change set to look at if
5.8.9 breaks too.
--
1024D/DB9
ut only on automatic
reload, and freshly on perl 5.10, not our previous version of perl 5.8.8!
I determined that when ModPerl::Util::unload_package is used to unload a
package, when it is then re-required in perl 5.10, 'use base' directives
don't function as expected.
I recrea
I posted this a little while ago, and was hoping that some of you
C-oriented folks could take a look at this stack trace and see if
anything jumps out at you that would indicate why I'm consistently
getting segmentation faults (11) when forking in a CGI running under
ModPerl::RegistryPrefork.
Than
On Sat 26 Jul 2008, Oleg Burlaca wrote:
> I need a stable Apache + mo_perl + perl combination.
> Is perl5.10 + mod_perl2.0.4. the right way to go?
yes, with prefork mpm.
> (are all perl modules working ok under 5.10 ?)
You can't expect someone to tell you even if all perl modules are
working by
I read that mod_perl 2.0.4 works with Perl 5.10.
Should I upgrade from 5.8.8. to 5.10?
from perl 5.10 release notes I saw that
"The Perl interpreter itself is faster with a smaller memory footprint,
and has several UTF-8 and threading improvements." etc.
I need a stable Apache
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:33:49PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:12:08AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>
> > Since I've upgraded to perl 5.10 on my debian unstable/sid box I get a
> > segfault when using MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession:
&
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:12:08AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> Since I've upgraded to perl 5.10 on my debian unstable/sid box I get a
> segfault when using MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession:
>
> [Sat May 17 16:14:55 2008] [notice] Apache/2.2.8 (Debian)
>
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 07:32:18AM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote:
> Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
>> [this message elicited no answers so far from mason-users, so maybe the
>> modperl community might be of help, thanks]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since I've upgraded to p
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:31:06AM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Louis-David Mitterrand
> >## When commented out perl 5.10 works fine
> >request_class =>
> > 'Mason
Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
[this message elicited no answers so far from mason-users, so maybe the
modperl community might be of help, thanks]
Hi,
Since I've upgraded to perl 5.10 on my debian unstable/sid box I get a
segfault when using MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Louis-David Mitterrand
>## When commented out perl 5.10 works fine
>request_class => 'MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession',
>session_class => &
[this message elicited no answers so far from mason-users, so maybe the
modperl community might be of help, thanks]
Hi,
Since I've upgraded to perl 5.10 on my debian unstable/sid box I get a
segfault when using MasonX::Request::WithApacheSession:
[Sat May 17 16:14:55 2008] [n
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:53:54PM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Niko Tyni wrote:
We're switching to Perl 5.10 in Debian soon, and I'm trying to update the
mod_perl2 package to keep it working. Unfortunately the ModPerl-Registry
test suite is failing on
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:53:54PM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >>Niko Tyni wrote:
> >>>We're switching to Perl 5.10 in Debian soon, and I'm trying to update the
> >>>mod_perl2 package to keep it working. Unfortunately the ModPerl-Regis
Niko Tyni wrote:
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:06:54AM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
Niko Tyni wrote:
We're switching to Perl 5.10 in Debian soon, and I'm trying to update the
mod_perl2 package to keep it working. Unfortunately the ModPerl-Registry
test suite is failing on
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 12:06:54AM -0700, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Niko Tyni wrote:
> >We're switching to Perl 5.10 in Debian soon, and I'm trying to update the
> >mod_perl2 package to keep it working. Unfortunately the ModPerl-Registry
> >test suite is fa
Niko Tyni wrote:
[Resending, as my first try on March 1st apparently got lost somewhere.
Apologies if this ends up as a duplicate.]
1. Problem Description:
We're switching to Perl 5.10 in Debian soon, and I'm trying to update the
mod_perl2 package to keep it working. Unfortunately t
[Resending, as my first try on March 1st apparently got lost somewhere.
Apologies if this ends up as a duplicate.]
1. Problem Description:
We're switching to Perl 5.10 in Debian soon, and I'm trying to update the
mod_perl2 package to keep it working. Unfortunately the ModPerl-Reg
Jie Gao wrote:
Hi All
Has this problem been solved finally in dev?
No, not yet. The main problem getting looked at lately was Perl 5.10,
and now that it looks like that is working.
You should try building the svn trunk with the following patch
applied and report if it fixes your problem
Hi All
Has this problem been solved finally in dev?
Regards,
Jie
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Heiko Jansen wrote:
> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:59:14 +0100
> From: Heiko Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: modperl@perl.apache.org
> Subject: mod_perl, Perl 5.10, Apache 2.2.6 =&
Hi All
Has this problem been finally solved in dev?
Regards,
Jie
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Heiko Jansen wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2007 19:59:14 +0100
From: Heiko Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: mod_perl, Perl 5.10, Apache 2.2.6 => Tests fail
Hi *.
I
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Issac Goldstand wrote:
>> -0.5
>>
>> I would actually like to see builds prepared against MSVCRT80, which is
>> available in the Vista SDK's bundled free compiler, rather than having
>> users need to download the SDK + VS Express Edition + configure the one
>> to find
Issac Goldstand wrote:
-0.5
I would actually like to see builds prepared against MSVCRT80, which is
available in the Vista SDK's bundled free compiler, rather than having
users need to download the SDK + VS Express Edition + configure the one
to find and work with the other (a royal pain). As l
llows folks to build to
> anything from VC6 to a 'plain SDK' (it now includes the compilers
> and tools), but for binaries, this will become foobar for folks who
> use ActiveState.
>
> Perl 5.10 is interesting for it's attention to Win32 64P model builds
> (64ILP r
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Randy Kobes wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Jan Dubois wrote:
> > Therefore I'm genuinely interested to learn where the problems are
> > if you build say Apache with VS2008, Perl with VC6 and e.g. mod_perl
> > with VC7. I would expect this to work just fine if we ignore the
> >
Jan Dubois wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
The obvious question is; what are your include libraries for that
module? The modern compiler's? (e.g. studio 200X?) The SDK's? Or
continue to build with VC 6?
That Platform SDK headers (in case the module uses APIs that were
i
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Jan Dubois wrote:
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ... ]
My instinct, with 2008 adding the new SDK features for apr such as
multicast group filtering, and the continued availability of a 2008
'express'/'lite' free version, is to take httpd 2.4 (3.0?) bina
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jan Dubois wrote:
>> I still haven't seen a compelling argument why someone wants to move
>> away from using MSVCRT.dll (and then continue switching CRTs then
>> every other year).
>
> The obvious question is; what are your include libraries for th
en?
The major class of problems happens that there is one posix files table
per linked clib, one memory pool per linked clib, etc. When resources
cross from one to the next, that's the crux of the issue.
Perl 5.10 is interesting for it's attention to Win32 64P model builds
(64ILP re
.4 (3.0?) binaries
> for apache httpd to this 2008 release. Yes, probably retain either
> .dsp files, or a makefile structure which allows folks to build to
> anything from VC6 to a 'plain SDK' (it now includes the compilers and
> tools), but for binaries, this will become fo
ake httpd 2.4 (3.0?) binaries
for apache httpd to this 2008 release. Yes, probably retain either
.dsp files, or a makefile structure which allows folks to build to
anything from VC6 to a 'plain SDK' (it now includes the compilers
and tools), but for binaries, this will become foobar for fo
Hi *.
I'm having trouble getting mod_perl to work with Perl 5.10 and Apache
2.2.6 on Solaris 64Bit/SPARC using Sun cc (Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13),
compiling as 64Bit app.
This applies to both mod_perl 2.0.3 and the latest (as of today)
mod_perl/2.0.4-dev.
2.0.3 won't build at all unless I
Colin Wetherbee wrote:
> Have any of you used mod_perl with Perl 5.10 yet? Are there any gotchas
> to consider?
Apparently so.
I have found the cause of my sometimes-it-works sometimes-it-doesnt
problem for PerlOutputFilterHandlers.
I tracked the problem down to MP_CODE_ATTRS(), calle
Michael Schout wrote:
> [Fri Dec 21 10:57:47 2007] [error] an unknown filter was not added:
> Foo::Filter::StripWhiteSpace
in addition, with PerlTrace enabled, I get:
modperl_filter_add_request: a non-mod_perl OutputFilter handler
Foo::Filter::StripWhiteSpace configured.
Regards,
Michael Schout
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:38:02 -0500, Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>> said:
>
> > Have any of you used mod_perl with Perl 5.10 yet? Are there any
> > gotchas to consider?
>
> Modperl1
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> Modperl1 doesn't work, patch available. As for modperl2 I don't know.
I've been running 5.10 in my modperl2/apache2.2 sandbox development
environment since yesterday. Haven't run into any issues related to
5.10 yet, but its still early on for me :).
Regards,
Michael S
John Siracusa wrote:
> On 12/21/07 2:32 AM, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> I fear I do not understand enough of mod_perl to volunteer to make a
>> release.
>
> Me neither, but have you at least contacted the mod_perl maintainers about
> this? Perhaps you could file a bug on rt.cpan.org even?
the
On 12/21/07 2:32 AM, Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
> I fear I do not understand enough of mod_perl to volunteer to make a
> release.
Me neither, but have you at least contacted the mod_perl maintainers about
this? Perhaps you could file a bug on rt.cpan.org even?
-John
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:38:02 -0500, Colin Wetherbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> said:
> Have any of you used mod_perl with Perl 5.10 yet? Are there any
> gotchas to consider?
Modperl1 doesn't work, patch available. As for modperl2 I don&
Have any of you used mod_perl with Perl 5.10 yet? Are there any gotchas
to consider?
I'm still waiting on the release of the Debian packages.
Colin
56 matches
Mail list logo
