Re: POST vs GET

2005-10-31 Thread Jeff
Background Running: current stable of mp2 and libapreq-devel Problem: I'm allowing GET style urls to forms for pre-population If the POST action is dirty though, i get cross contamination of vars IF there was a NULL action in the form ie: url: [EMAIL PROTECTED]&su

Re: POST vs GET

2005-10-31 Thread Jonathan
typo. i'm not in good typing mode today - i strained something in my neck, and have having trouble motivating myself to work, much less perform correctly. thanks for the note. On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: I assume this is a typo, but that should be method="POST"

Re: POST vs GET

2005-10-31 Thread Jonathan
On Oct 31, 2005, at 6:29 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: pulling POST or GET data for a given fieldname In place of param(), use the body() or args() methods, respectively. Simple and stupid enough. Many thanks!

Re: POST vs GET

2005-10-31 Thread Joe Schaefer
Jonathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > but, can i hope (can i? seriously.) that there is some mechanism in > mp2/libapreq that will let me explcitly choose whether param is > pulling POST or GET data for a given fieldname In place of param(), use the body() or args() methods, respectively. -

Re: POST vs GET

2005-10-31 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Jonathan wrote: {form action="" method=POST"} I assume this is a typo, but that should be method="POST" just to state the obvious. ^ -- END What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger.

POST vs GET

2005-10-31 Thread Jonathan
Background Running: current stable of mp2 and libapreq-devel Problem: I'm allowing GET style urls to forms for pre-population If the POST action is dirty though, i get cross contamination of vars IF there was a NULL action in the form ie: url: [EMAIL PROTECTED]&s