Joseph E. Sacco, Ph. D. wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> Good News...
>
> Following the philosophy of "let sleeping dogs lie" I have replaced YDL's
> httpd-2.0.40 using SRPM's from the Fedora project [RedHat has developed a PPC
> branch. The new YDL maybe???].
>
> With an installed version of httpd [2.0
Geoff,
Good News...
Following the philosophy of "let sleeping dogs lie" I have replaced YDL's
httpd-2.0.40 using SRPM's from the Fedora project [RedHat has developed a PPC
branch. The new YDL maybe???].
With an installed version of httpd [2.0.49] that is acceptable to
mod_perl-1.99_13, mod_
Joseph E. Sacco, Ph. D. wrote:
> Geoff,
>
> Thanks for taking the time to respond.
sure :)
>
> mod_perl_08 is about as new a version of mod_perl I can use given the
> version of httpd, 2.0.40-21.3b, that I am running. I will update httpd in the
> near future, but I suspect that I will enc
Geoff,
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
mod_perl_08 is about as new a version of mod_perl I can use given the
version of httpd, 2.0.40-21.3b, that I am running. I will update httpd in the
near future, but I suspect that I will encounter the same problem.
I have looked at the source cod
> I am having problems building mod_perl-1.99_xx. Specifically there is an
> unsatisfied reference to 'my_perl'.
>
> For example [using the source that came with YDL-3.0.1]:
>
> gcc -I/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/mod_perl-1.99_05/src/modules/perl
> -I/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/mod_perl-1.99_05/xs -I/usr/inclu
System:
* PowerMac silver with dual G4 533MHz CPUs'
* YDL-3.0.1
* perl-5.8.3
* httpd-2.0.40-21.3b
* mod_perl-1.99_xx
===
I am having problems building mod_perl-1.99_xx. Specifically there is an
unsatisfied reference to 'my_perl'.
For example [using t
