On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Matty Ronald wrote:
> Can any one please tell me how to disable perl's malloc in mod_perl?
>
> I donot want to recompile perl.
>
> Is there any way that i can disable perl's malloc in mod_perl only?
No, sorry. Since mod_perl is just embedding your perl in apache,
Hi,
Can any one please tell me how to disable perl's malloc in mod_perl?
I donot want to recompile perl.
Is there any way that i can disable perl's malloc in mod_perl only?
Regards,
Matty
peter pilsl wrote:
Ok - I finally solved the mystery.
I had only one single libperl.so on my system in /usr/local/lib and even
this one was too much.
Using ldd I discovered that my new failing mod_perl.so was linked
against this libperl.so while my old working mod_perl.so wasnt linked
against a
Stas Bekman wrote:
that normally means that you have libperl.so in /usr/lib and it's not the
one used by the perl you've built mod_perl with. Please post the output of
ldd /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_perl.so
and if you have libperl.so in /usr/local/lib and /usr/lib. if you have
both, that's
peter pilsl wrote:
I use mod_perl for a very long time already. Now I installed
apache2.0.52 and took the chance to install a new mod_perl as well.
First I tried the new 2.0RC3, then I tried 1.99.17, then 1.99.16 und
finally 1.99.14 and all failed with the very same problem. Apache could
not st
Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>I nuked everything I had that smelled like mod_perl and mod_perl fails
>>at the make test:
>
>
>>/usr/src/mod_perl-1.99_16/t/conf/httpd.conf:
>>Cannot load /usr/src/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so into
>>server: /usr/src/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl/mo
> I nuked everything I had that smelled like mod_perl and mod_perl fails
> at the make test:
> /usr/src/mod_perl-1.99_16/t/conf/httpd.conf:
> Cannot load /usr/src/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so into
> server: /usr/src/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl/mod_perl.so:
> undefined symbo
Geoffrey Young wrote:
if you can (like there is no mod_perl 1.0 installation you care about) I
would remove all Apache related things in your site_lib, including
mod_perl.pm
ModPerl/*
Apache/*
Apache2/*
as well as /usr/local/apache2/modules/mod_perl.so. then 'make realclean' in
your mod_per
> What suprised me is that at the end it states that there are several
> versions of mod_perl-modules installed. Is this a possible cause of my
> problem?
yes, quite possibly.
> Apache::Request: -
> CGI: 3.05
> LWP: -
> mod_perl : 1.9908, 1.9914, 1.9916
if you ca
I could swear that there is something left off from your last
installations see the different perl installations found on your system.
Still this is only a wild guess you have to wait for the gurus around here.
As a sidenote I always install/compile my own perl and for my apache you
could also
My first problem-report yesterday did not include much useful
information. Thnx to Tom for pointing this out, so here it comes again
with much more information from t/REPORT
What suprised me is that at the end it states that there are several
versions of mod_perl-modules installed. Is this a pos
Hi Peter,
you fail to give us the information required to solve your problem.
Please see:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/help/help.html#Reporting_Problems
Tom
peter pilsl wrote:
I use mod_perl for a very long time already. Now I installed
apache2.0.52 and took the chance to install a new mod
I use mod_perl for a very long time already. Now I installed
apache2.0.52 and took the chance to install a new mod_perl as well.
First I tried the new 2.0RC3, then I tried 1.99.17, then 1.99.16 und
finally 1.99.14 and all failed with the very same problem. Apache could
not start up due to the f
As some people might now, OSCon (http://conferences.oreillynet.com/os2004/)
has just finished, and there was a mod_perl PR BOF were a bunch of mod_perl people
gathered around and discussed mod_perl PR and advocacy.
mod_perl is coming closer and closer to a 2.0 release (really soon now (tm))
and the
Sorry for the duplicate post. I sent one from the wrong email address
and didn't think that it went through.
George
Hi,
This past weekend I upgraded a server to the latest R-tag version of
Slashcode. Somehow, it has broken other applications on the server
including mod_survey (perl), and mailman (python). Either moving them to
an alternate virtual host, or commenting out the slash virtual host
definition get
Hi,
This past weekend I upgraded a server to the latest R-tag version of
Slashcode. Somehow, it has broken other applications on the server
including mod_survey (perl), and mailman (python). Either moving them to
an alternate virtual host, or commenting out the slash virtual host
definition gets
17 matches
Mail list logo