Re: Generic print concatenation question

2008-10-22 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 6:28 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would not ask, if there were not sometimes really many of these being > executed over and over again. I figure it may be worth knowing if one of > the forms above (or another one I haven't tried) is really better than >

Re: Generic print concatenation question

2008-10-22 Thread David Nicol
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:28 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > another one I haven't tried how about an Inline::C function that wraps printf and takes $var2 as an argument, and another that takes $var1 as an argument which overwrites the static buffer allocated for the format string?

Re: Generic print concatenation question

2008-10-22 Thread Clinton Gormley
> This is probably a question better asked to the perl monks or similar, > but if there are any of them lurking around here, it would save me a > subscription. it's a subscription worth having :) I've learnt more about Perl since I've been there than in the preceding decade. > Now, my question

Generic print concatenation question

2008-10-22 Thread André Warnier
Hi. This is probably a question better asked to the perl monks or similar, but if there are any of them lurking around here, it would save me a subscription. In various programs, I do a lot of printing, for results or for logging. Really many print statements, in forms such as : print OUT "$