, 2005 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: CGI::Session or CGI::Application
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 14:45 -0500, William McKee wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:15:31AM -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
> > > CGI::Session does not appear to be well maintained. It's very
popular
> > &
Hi Perrin,
Thanks for the feedback. I've been meaning to find a better alternative.
I think many programmers writing standard cgi scripts are scared off
from using the Apache::Session modules because of the chosen namespace,
although I understand that it's possible to use them outside of Apache.
M
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 14:45 -0500, William McKee wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:15:31AM -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
> > CGI::Session does not appear to be well maintained. It's very popular
> > and I know many people who have tried to send in patches and fixes but
> > the author has been
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:15:31AM -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
> CGI::Session does not appear to be well maintained. It's very popular
> and I know many people who have tried to send in patches and fixes but
> the author has been unresponsive.
Which is really ashame since it's listed in the P
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 21:57 -0500, Todd Finney wrote:
> Have you checked ::MySQL against Apache::Session::DB_File? My experience
> is a couple of years out of date on this, but I switched away from using
> ::MySQL for sessions because it was such a pig.
MySQL will be a lot faster than the tied
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Interesting, your comments on CGI::Session vs Apache::Session as I've
>> had
>> nothing but trouble with Apache::Session::File -- session data
>> inconsistently being written to the file.
>
> I'm sorry to hear that. Did you mention those problems to the author or
> b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, your comments on CGI::Session vs Apache::Session as I've had
nothing but trouble with Apache::Session::File -- session data
inconsistently being written to the file.
I'm sorry to hear that. Did you mention those problems to the author or
bring it up on the mo
, I had to scramble to re-write code for several sites to
implement the 'new' CGI::Session oo implementation. Do you use the
Apache::Session::File module or one of the others?
Sys
>
> Octavian Rasnita wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> If I want to use CGI::Session or CGI::Ap
On 15 Jan 2005, at 05:29, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
If I want to use CGI::Session or CGI::Application, can I do it if I use
mod_perl or there are better modules for using with MP?
CGI::Application JFW for me under mod_perl.
--
Dave Hodgkinson
CTO, Rockit Factory Ltd.
http
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
If I want to use CGI::Session or CGI::Application, can I do it if I use
mod_perl or there are better modules for using with MP?
Just a couple of thoughts:
CGI::Session does not appear to be well maintained. It's very popular
and I know many people who have tri
On 1/15/05 0:29, "Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I want to use CGI::Session or CGI::Application, can I do it if I use
> mod_perl or there are better modules for using with MP?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Teddy
>
Both work quite we
Hi,
If I want to use CGI::Session or CGI::Application, can I do it if I use
mod_perl or there are better modules for using with MP?
Thanks.
Teddy
12 matches
Mail list logo
