Re: Build static mod_perl and apachev2.2.3 fail

2007-01-06 Thread James Smith
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:39 AM, LUKE wrote: > > > Have anyone build static mod_perl and apache v2.0.59 successfully? > > most people have long abandoned the static mod_perl route. its a > PITA to maintain ( you have to upgrade mp and apache at the same

Re: Build static mod_perl and apachev2.2.3 fail

2007-01-06 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Jan 6, 2007, at 7:39 AM, LUKE wrote: Have anyone build static mod_perl and apache v2.0.59 successfully? most people have long abandoned the static mod_perl route. its a PITA to maintain ( you have to upgrade mp and apache at the same time ) performance wise, there's basically no diffe

Build static mod_perl and apachev2.2.3 fail

2007-01-06 Thread LUKE
What is difference between apache v2.0.59 and v2.2.3? I can build static mod_perl and apache v2.2.3. Have anyone build static mod_perl and apache v2.0.59 successfully? -- Makefile.PL PREFIX=/usr/local/Portal/perlmods LIB=/usr/local/Portal/perlmods \ MP_USE_STATIC=1 MP_AP_PREFIX="/usr/local/mpa