Re: Apache::Session permissions problem

2003-11-13 Thread Jonathan Swartz
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 16:47, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > > So the default MySQL driver does locking just like Apache::Session, and > > there's no built-in way to turn it locking. So it's possible that the same > > locking problems that plague Apache::Session would happen in CGI::Session. > > Argh! >

Re: Apache::Session permissions problem

2003-11-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 16:47, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > So the default MySQL driver does locking just like Apache::Session, and > there's no built-in way to turn it locking. So it's possible that the same > locking problems that plague Apache::Session would happen in CGI::Session. > Argh! So, basica

Re: Apache::Session permissions problem

2003-11-13 Thread Jonathan Swartz
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 15:18, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > > Interesting! I'll take a look. Have you seen any comparisons of features > > anywhere? > > No, I don't think anyone has written up a comparison. Well, at first glance it looks promising - lots of documentation and examples, last release pre

Re: Apache::Session permissions problem

2003-11-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 15:18, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > Interesting! I'll take a look. Have you seen any comparisons of features > anywhere? No, I don't think anyone has written up a comparison. - Perrin -- Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/mailli

Re: Apache::Session permissions problem

2003-11-13 Thread Jonathan Swartz
> > > The latest Apache::Session on CPAN is version 1.54, released in October > > 2001. > > > > Perhaps this answers my previous question. :) > > Yes, it is far from actively maintained. I've been considering > recommending that people use CGI::Session instead, since it is better > documented and

Re: Apache::Session permissions problem

2003-11-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 11:05, Jonathan Swartz wrote: > I've deactivated the link and pointed to the new handler. Thanks! > Is this outdated information? Is Flex now considered reasonable for > production? (Not sure why it "for debugging" in the first place.) Is there > any disadvantage to using it

Re: Apache::Session permissions problem

2003-11-13 Thread Jonathan Swartz
Perrin Harkins writes: > Sorry if I came off overly critical. Many people have had problems > trying to use Mason with Apache::Session because of that article. This > is why on the Mason website the link to that article describes it as > outdated and steers people to newer documentation. (It pr