On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Dave Morgan wrote:
> First off, please let me apologize for the tone of my last email,
> It was certainly not what I intended.
No worries. I assumed it was a caffeine shortage. That's what I suffer from
sometimes. :-)
> I have to stop having discussions about syste
Hi Randal,
>>>
>>> You lost me. But really, I strongly recommend against the use of
Apache::DBI. Some discussion here:
>>>
>>>
http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Connector/lib/DBIx/Connector.pm#Description
>>>
>
>Dave> And having read that, I strongly recommend against the use of
DBIx-Conne
> "Dave" == Dave Morgan writes:
>>
>> You lost me. But really, I strongly recommend against the use of
>> Apache::DBI. Some discussion here:
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Connector/lib/DBIx/Connector.pm#Description
>>
Dave> And having read that, I strongly recommend against the
First off, please let me apologize for the tone of my last email,
It was certainly not what I intended.
I have to stop having discussions about system design and
philosophy after having meetings with a developer who's most
intelligent statement was "It works on my machine". Cold Fusion not
mod-pe
On Jun 27, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Dave Morgan wrote:
> What's the point of it?
First of all, what Perrin said. :-)
> As far as I can see the author claims to have issues with Apache::DBI and
> does not
> like the hidden aspect.
FWIW, I am the author.
> I have never experienced his "issues" and the
Please calm down, folks.
Apache::DBI is a module that was designed to help with porting legacy
CGI applications to mod_perl. It's a valid criticism to say that the
action-at-a-distance parts of it are undesirable in new mod_perl
applications. Personally, I have used mostly custom caching code
in
On 27/06/11 04:27 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Dave Morgan wrote:
You lost me. But really, I strongly recommend against the use of Apache::DBI.
Some discussion here:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Connector/lib/DBIx/Connector.pm#Description
And having read
On Jun 27, 2011, at 2:17 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
>> You lost me. But really, I strongly recommend against the use of
>> Apache::DBI. Some discussion here:
>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Connector/lib/DBIx/Connector.pm#Description
>
> It seems like you are looking for a more feature rich db c
On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Dave Morgan wrote:
>> You lost me. But really, I strongly recommend against the use of
>> Apache::DBI. Some discussion here:
>>
>>
>> http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Connector/lib/DBIx/Connector.pm#Description
>>
>
> And having read that, I strongly recommend a
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 1:22 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
>
>> Wow, that's obnoxious:
>>
>> 1237 if ($INC{'Apache/DBI.pm'} && $ENV{MOD_PERL}) {
>> 1238 $old_connect_via = $DBI::connect_via;
>> 1239 $DBI::connect_via = 'connect';
>> 1240 }
On 27/06/11 02:22 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
Snip .
You lost me. But really, I strongly recommend against the use of Apache::DBI.
Some discussion here:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Connector/lib/DBIx/Connector.pm#Description
And
On Jun 27, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> Wow, that's obnoxious:
>
> 1237 if ($INC{'Apache/DBI.pm'} && $ENV{MOD_PERL}) {
> 1238 $old_connect_via = $DBI::connect_via;
> 1239 $DBI::connect_via = 'connect';
> 1240 }
DBIx::Connector does the same thing.
> And it is also apparentl
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Here is a comment that might be helpful, because it also explains why
> DBIx::Class can work with Apache::DBI (and why it is not needed):
>
> http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/dbix-class/2006-April/001153.html
>
> ""
> DBIx::Class alrea
13 matches
Mail list logo
