Re: Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-22 Thread Geoffrey Young
> > Oh, I see what you're saying. What's happening is that if I decline, > it's getting *default*, rather than "what was previously configured". > Is that what you're saying? yup. > Any way to push another content handler > on the stack, rather than replacing what's there? (Yeah, I can > rep

Re: Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-22 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 22 January 2004 at 14:02:45 -0500 > > >>the etag and last-modified headers setting has nothing to do with mod_perl > >>in this case - it's done by default_handler, so if you fallback to > >>default_handler then you get to deal with its logic and res

Re: Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-22 Thread Geoffrey Young
>>the etag and last-modified headers setting has nothing to do with mod_perl >>in this case - it's done by default_handler, so if you fallback to >>default_handler then you get to deal with its logic and results. > > > That can't be what's happening; *without* my module, the request is > served

Re: Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-21 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Ged Haywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello there, > > On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > >> (Apache 1.3.22, mod_perl 1.26). >> [snip] >> So, any suggestions? > > In addition to Geoff's comments I think you should upgrade ASAP to the > latest versions of Apache and mod_perl. If

Re: Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-21 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Geoffrey Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Dyer-Bennet wrote: >> When I call update_mtime I seem to get set_etags done automatically as >> well (or perhaps it's set_last_modified that does it?). This is >> *BAD*. It's also not documented anywhere I can find online or in >> _Writing Apach

Re: Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-21 Thread Ged Haywood
Hello there, On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > (Apache 1.3.22, mod_perl 1.26). > [snip] > So, any suggestions? In addition to Geoff's comments I think you should upgrade ASAP to the latest versions of Apache and mod_perl. If you don't, you are likely to come up against a few thin

Re: Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-21 Thread Geoffrey Young
David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > When I call update_mtime I seem to get set_etags done automatically as > well (or perhaps it's set_last_modified that does it?). This is > *BAD*. It's also not documented anywhere I can find online or in > _Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C_. (Apache 1.3.22, mod

Actions of $r->update_mtime

2004-01-20 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
When I call update_mtime I seem to get set_etags done automatically as well (or perhaps it's set_last_modified that does it?). This is *BAD*. It's also not documented anywhere I can find online or in _Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C_. (Apache 1.3.22, mod_perl 1.26). This comes up in the