Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
I'll try to summarize what you said in a table. The following approaches work
for Listen:
Apache \ OS | IPV4 | IPV6
--enable-v4-mapped | 80 | 80
--disable-v4-mapped | can't happen | 127.0.
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 14:52 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> [...]
> >>>Ideally, to fix this once and for all, we need to determine 2 things:
> >>>
> >>>1. The availability of IPv6 on that box
> >>>2. Wether httpd was compiled with --enable-v4-mapped or not (or what it
> >>
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
Ideally, to fix this once and for all, we need to determine 2 things:
1. The availability of IPv6 on that box
2. Wether httpd was compiled with --enable-v4-mapped or not (or what it
defaulted to)
Well, if we can figure out (2), then 1 can be skipped. If someone bu
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 12:27 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 15:51 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >>>[...]
> > [...]
> >
> > Ideally, to fix this once
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 15:51 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
Configuring httpd with --enable-v4-mapped will make it all work, but
it's not the default, so most people on those BSDs are get
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 15:51 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > [...]
> > Configuring httpd with --enable-v4-mapped will make it all work, but
> > it's not the default, so most people on those BSDs are getting an http
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Andrew Wyllie wrote:
So, after rereading my previous post, I found one slight difference
(funny how
it works that way sometimes). When I used telnet to connect to the
server, it
used '::1' as an address for local
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Andrew Wyllie wrote:
> >
> >
> > So, after rereading my previous post, I found one slight difference
> > (funny how
> > it works that way sometimes). When I used telnet to connect to the
> > server, it
> > used '::1' as an address for loc
