Phillip,
If it helps you move along better and have more time to review both 1
& 2, I'll voulenteer to pick up RMing 2.09 in addition to 1.34 so we can
get them both out the door. Let me know.
Issac
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Are we going to have 2.09 release? It's been quite some time s
Are we going to have 2.09 release? It's been quite some time since RC2
actually, i'd like to see an RC3-- there was an issue I kept complaining
about that Joe was going to solve thanks to some testing by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- reference the posting on 2007.05.25
The RC3 was what I meant.
what a
Are we going to have 2.09 release? It's been quite some time since
RC2
actually, i'd like to see an RC3-- there was an issue I kept
complaining about that Joe was going to solve thanks to some testing
by [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- reference the posting on 2007.05.25
Supposedly, this is going
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Are we going to have 2.09 release? It's been quite some time since RC2
went out...
That was the plan whenever I made the branch way long ago.
After moving, loosing a datacenter, and being swamped at work, I haven't
read a single mailing list since April
Are we going to have 2.09 release? It's been quite some time since RC2
went out...
--
Bojan
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
+1 - all tests pass on
- Win32: Apache/2.2.3 (winnt), perl-5.8.8 (ActivePerl
817), mod_perl-2.0.3-rc2
- linux: Apache/2.0.55 (prefork), perl-5.8.7,
mod_perl-2.0.2
--
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09.tar.gz
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09.tar.gz.asc
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.09.tar.gz.md5
*
