Re: mod_perl without persistent interpreter state?

2005-12-22 Thread pbdgny
On 12/23/05, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Also don't most shared hosts use mod_php, not PHP/CGI? What would be > > the point of PHP via CGI? mod_php works just fine. (As long as you > > stay aw

Re: mod_perl without persistent interpreter state?

2005-12-22 Thread pbdgny
On 12/19/05, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a way to configure mod_perl to act more like mod_php in that > > each request gets a "fresh" interpreter to work in? > > Just set MaxRquestsPerChild to 1. However, most shared hosts actually > run PHP as CGI. Erm.. Spawning a who

Status of mod_perl 2?

2005-12-18 Thread pbdgny
Hello,What is the current status of mod_perl 2?  Is it considered stable enough for production use?Thanks,David

mod_perl without persistent interpreter state?

2005-12-18 Thread pbdgny
Hello,When last I checked, mod_perl is not that great for a shared hosting environment.  Now I see that v.2 has accommodations for Apache vhosts, but it still looks like each site needs it's own full blown Perl interpreter sucking down memory. Is there a way to configure mod_perl to act more like m