On 12/23/05, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 22, 2005, at 11:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Also don't most shared hosts use mod_php, not PHP/CGI? What would be
> > the point of PHP via CGI? mod_php works just fine. (As long as you
> > stay aw
On 12/19/05, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a way to configure mod_perl to act more like mod_php in that
> > each request gets a "fresh" interpreter to work in?
>
> Just set MaxRquestsPerChild to 1. However, most shared hosts actually
> run PHP as CGI.
Erm.. Spawning a who
Hello,What is the current status of mod_perl 2? Is it considered stable enough for production use?Thanks,David
Hello,When last I checked, mod_perl is not that great for a shared hosting environment. Now I see that v.2 has accommodations for Apache vhosts, but it still looks like each site needs it's own full blown Perl interpreter sucking down memory.
Is there a way to configure mod_perl to act more like m