On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:24:42AM -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:49, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:50:00PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote:
> >> I think getting rid of the segfault is a good thing. But if the main
> >> problem is i
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 09:50:00PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>
> > Another option would be to copy/local() the array in
> > modpler_perl_call_list. Of course that still wont get it "right"
> > because we wont run any newly defined subs... B
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 04:02:05PM -0700, Fred Moyer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:25:14PM -0400, Adam Prime wrote:
> >> Maybe you could try doing the push_handler for the ChildExitHandler
> >> when the ChildIn
> Adam
>
> Tim Bunce wrote:
> >This is proving to be tricky.
> >
> >If I load Devel::NYTProf::Apache[1] in the main part of httpd.conf then
> >I get a profile that includes all the activity *except* for any activity
> >in vhosts that use +Parent.
> >
> >
This is proving to be tricky.
If I load Devel::NYTProf::Apache[1] in the main part of httpd.conf then
I get a profile that includes all the activity *except* for any activity
in vhosts that use +Parent.
If I load it inside the VirtualHost section then I get a profile of
activity within that vhost
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:06:22PM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You have to expect certain basic things to work, and one of them is that a
> > connection which can't be ping'ed is not holding a table lock.
>
> I completely disagree. Here's
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:23:12PM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Apache::DBI and DBI's connect_cached both claim to keep your database
> handles fresh and happy, but I've had numerous problems trying to get either
> of them to work properly. If a database connection is dropped, sometimes I'd
> ha
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:42:10PM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Jeremy Nixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like it would work perfectly with connect_cached, which I hadn't
> > known about, but now that I do, I'm all excited to change my code to use
> > it instead of Apache::DBI.
>
>
On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 02:00:15AM +, Jeremy Nixon wrote:
> Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [Fri Jan 13 23:46:28 2006] [error] [client 192.168.99.112] DBD::Pg::db
> > prepare_cached failed: FATAL: terminating connection due to administrator
>
> Here's the thing: if your data
[I wrote this over a week ago but queued it waiting till I submitted
the changes. That's still not happened yet so I'll just post it anyway.]
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 05:22:34PM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:59:34PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> >Very cool! On
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 01:59:34PM -0400, Sam Tregar wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Nuff said!
>
> Very cool! One comment: don't bother with 'use constant' here. The
> tiny amount of time saved by using a constant will be overwhelmed by
> the time
11 matches
Mail list logo
