On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Will Fould wrote:
> Is anyone on this list using (or considering using) a modperl service to
> handle a Flex client?i
Do you mean Parse::Flex? If not, what's Flex? It's kind of you to
assume we all know but a URL would be helpful..
/joel
On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:28:17PM +0200, Moritz Maisel wrote:
> Running Debian:
> libapache2-mod-perl21.999.21-1
> Integration of perl with the Apache2 web server
So you're running an alpha release of mod_perl 2, with 21 levels of
backported patches? Try up
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:20:24PM +0200, Krist van Besien wrote:
> Suppose I start my apache with an extra paramter, eg "-D FOO". Is
> there a way to test for the presences of this parameter from within
> mod perl sections?
TFM would have told you, but you can use Apache->define("FOO").
/joel
On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 12:46:43PM +0100, Simon Wray wrote:
>
> The error log contains no entry pertaining to the loading of the page.
> Which makes me think the script has been located & executed...
Really? Not just that it didn't even parse the file for SSI? That's how
I'd read it. Change the s
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 04:50:46PM -0500, Frank Wiles wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:54:08 -0400
> Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > > You should create a single Template object, put it in a global, and
> > > reuse it.
>
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:24:32PM -0500, Matthew wrote:
> > Memory is cheap / CPU is cheap
>
> My boss makes this same argument and I hate it. Wasting is still wasting.
Wasting developer time over a measly couple of KB, you mean?
/joel
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:48:26PM -0400, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
> Hi All --
>
> Question for the group, at the very distinct risk of starting a holy
> war:
>
> What is the general opinion of HTML::Mason?
It's a big and fairly powerful templates-on-steroids system. I have
ideological objections
Hi,
Apache-Test-1.28 fails tests due to expecting the apache cfg directive
"SetEnv" to work. AFAIK this has been PerlSetEnv for *years*, so long
that I'm thinking the problem must be something else because this is too
obvious a bug. So I'm wondering what else the problem might be?
Syntax error on
On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 05:23:24PM -0500, Mark Galbreath wrote:
> which then begs the question, why RoR and not Catalyst?
Better marketing, basically. Also the attraction of something new,
written in a language about which people have written a lot of new
things, and which hasn't attracted the neg
