B, but I'd have the actual request
handled by another daemon.
I can get into further detail and speculation, but maybe we'll leave
that as homework.
--Joel
On Nov 12, 2009, at 1:53 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Hi.
There is an increasingly popular technique to emulate server-
initi
I wonder if there is a
way to do a database lookup and substitute that?...
In my experience, you really want to minimize the hits on your
database and placing a lookup of any kind for -every- connection to
apache would be murderous regardless of which database you're using.
--Joel
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Will Fould wrote:
> Is anyone on this list using (or considering using) a modperl service to
> handle a Flex client?i
Do you mean Parse::Flex? If not, what's Flex? It's kind of you to
assume we all know but a URL would be helpful..
/joel
d patches? Try upgrading to something post 2.0 and see if you
still have issues. On the whole it's best to run stable software, that
way you can be a bit surer of sanity. mod_perl 1.99 has never been
considered suitable for production.
/joel
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:20:24PM +0200, Krist van Besien wrote:
> Suppose I start my apache with an extra paramter, eg "-D FOO". Is
> there a way to test for the presences of this parameter from within
> mod perl sections?
TFM would have told you, but you can use Apache->define("FOO").
/joel
On 1/24/07, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/24/07, Joel Gwynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. I replaced that line with a hard-coded file path, and now it's
> looking much better. So I guess it's something about the Request
> object.
My gue
On 1/24/07, Joel Gwynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/24/07, Robert Landrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joel Gwynn wrote:
> > Interesting. I just might be doing that:
> > $config_file = $self->param('r')->dir_config('CONFIG_FILE');
&g
On 1/24/07, Robert Landrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joel Gwynn wrote:
> Interesting. I just might be doing that:
> $config_file = $self->param('r')->dir_config('CONFIG_FILE');
>
> In my section, I have this:
>
> PerlSetVar CONFIG_FILE /projec
On 1/22/07, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/21/07, Joel Gwynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a mod_perl application which segfaults on every 10th or so
> requests. Here's what I get in my error log:
>
> [notice] child pid exit sign
On 1/21/07, Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 21, 2007, at 12:05 PM, Joel Gwynn wrote:
> I've got a mod_perl application which segfaults on every 10th or so
> requests. Here's what I get in my error log:
>
> [notice] child pid exit signal Seg
I'm running mod_perl 2.0.2 (I think) on apache 2 on Debian Linux
2.6.9-023stab033.6
I've got a mod_perl application which segfaults on every 10th or so
requests. Here's what I get in my error log:
[notice] child pid exit signal Segmentation fault (11)
How would I go about troubleshooting
an
a http:// URL pointing at the apache server? That will certainly prevent
you from executing the include correctly!
/joel
ecompile templates, it caches them on first use.
Which means you'll take the hit in each forked child unless you
explicitly precompile them. But perhaps I'm wrong about that?
/joel
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 03:24:32PM -0500, Matthew wrote:
> > Memory is cheap / CPU is cheap
>
> My boss makes this same argument and I hate it. Wasting is still wasting.
Wasting developer time over a measly couple of KB, you mean?
/joel
n
hit. CGI::Application is fast, too, but you end up writing a lot more
code than you do with a framework like Catalyst.
In summary, I'd go for TT and Catalyst, for most applications. Of
course, there will be exceptions -- what is the intended platform for
your app? Does it have to run as a CGI, rather than via mod_perl or
FCGI?
/joel
ht be?
Syntax error on line 52 of
/home/joel/.cpanplus/5.8.8/build/Apache-Test-1.28/t/conf/extra.conf:
Invalid command 'SetEnv', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
included in the server configuration
That seems fairly clear to me, but I'm wondering what else I migh
o of the
quality of the RoR viral marketing would make a real difference.
...Not that I, personally, have sufficient CFT to produce the damn
thing, you understand. I'll just fling poo from the sidelines.
/joel
of large values is fine on the same machine.
Has anyone else observed this behavior? Does anyone know if this has
been fixed in any of the later versions of libapreq2 ? I read over
the changes log but didn't find anything that I could tell related to
this issue.
Thanks,
Joel
eans we're not even using a custom
PerlResponseHandler inside our httpd.conf.
So I can call the script as mod_cgi or as mod_perl or even on the command
line for debugging. Am I doing something wrong? :)
--Joel
>On 5/26/05, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2
ed to test on Linux.)
I will revisit this sometime in January. We have year-end things to do
here at work and it's absorbing all my time. Bleah. I'd rather play with
Apache. :)
Thanks,
--Joel
>On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 09:26 -0500, Joel wrote:
>> And from what I understand, this i
nagging thing about this is why hasn't anyone thought of this
and implemented it before? :) Or maybe I'm just WAY off-base.
Thanks,
--Joel
--
Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Forgive me if this has already been reported. I could not find any
references to it in the archives.
--Joel
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
'make test' fails while initializing the apache server for testing. Here
are th
.conf:
PerlModule Apache::Reload
PerlInitHandler Apache::Reload
Do you have Apache::Reload set as your PerlInitHandler in your
httpd.conf? No mention was made of it in your snippets of your
httpd.conf.
--Joel
>Hi,
>
>This is probably a question that has been answered before but I
So perhaps it might be wise to investigate CGI::Session since it's more
recent and is more likely to be under active development. Then again,
maybe Apache::Session is perfect the way it is, although I doubt that. :)
Good luck!
--Joel
>Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
>> What do you need s
24 matches
Mail list logo
