On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
> On 02/16/2014 09:36 AM, Steve Hay wrote:
>
>> On 16 February 2014 15:11, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 11:10:20PM +1100, Carl Brewer wrote:
>>>
Having just downloaded this latest SVN repo, a grep for "2.4" in t
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Steve Hay wrote:
> On 9 February 2014 05:49, Steve Baldwin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not sure what I'm doing wrong here. I'm just trying to get the client ip
> > address in a PerlResponseHandler as follows:
> >
> > :
> > use Apache2::Connection;
> > :
> > my $remo
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> I run a busy website algebra.com on a CentOS server.
>
> Occasionally, apache processes crash with a "segmentation fault".
>
> I often get 140+ object requests per second, so isolating which request
> caused segfault, by looking at logs, is not
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Jim Schueler wrote:
> In light of Joe Schaefer's response, I appear to be outgunned. So, if
> nothing else, can someone please clarify whether "de-chunked" means
> re-assembled?
yes, where re-assembled means convert it back to the original data stream
without any
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Michiel Beijen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> > mod_backtrace (http://emptyhammock.com/projects/httpd/diag/) may be a
> > shortcut to getting a backtrace. There's a binary for use with Apache
> 2.2
>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michiel Beijen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using mod_perl 2.0.7 on Windows with Apache 2.2.23. I got Apache
> from Apachelounge, and compiled mod_perl and perl 5.16.2 myself using
> Visual Studio 2008. I'm using a 32-bit Windows Vista.
>
> Pretty frequently my app (which w
(Not PerlSetEnv, just plain SetEnv)
I saw this in a .conf snippet for configuring mod_perl but AFAIK this
would only be used by external CGI processes that needed that to find
the right Perl.
TIA!
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Randolf Richardson wrote:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#keepalivetimeout
>
> Note: The KeepAliveTimeout directive is only available starting
> with Apache HTTPd v2.3.2.
It is ancient. 2.3.2 brought the ability to
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:25 PM, silent wrote:
> you have compiled and installed one apache, and you made it start at boot
> time,
> you must disable it or remove it ( do not let it start at boot time )
>
> 2011/5/18 Tom Kane :
>> I tried to incorporate suggestions I've received. After restarting
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:36 PM, David wrote:
> If I haven't sent this to the correct place please inform me.
>
> I've look through the assorted documentation, both mod_perl and Apache, and
> haven't found a solution to my situation. I've also given the internet a try
> with no luck. I admit I'm n
2010/5/6 Torsten Förtsch :
> On Thursday 06 May 2010 13:53:37 tech_list wrote:
>> >> [ error] '/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs -q NOTEST_CPPFLAGS' failed:
>> >> [ error] Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at
>> >> /usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs line 86.
>>
> Okay, I see. My apxs starts with
>
> #!/u
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Is anyone here attending ApacheCon in Oakland this year? I am
> organizing a mod_perl social. I'll be at the conference at least one
> day hacking mod_perl.
This lurker will be there.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Adriano Caloiaro wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone point me in the correct direction to support byte range
> responses in mod_perl2? From what I've read, Apache should understand that
> it needs to apply the byterange filter whenever $r->sendfile is used on a
> l
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> > Backing up a bit...
> >
> > I originally thought we could map bit values in 2.2.x to avoid affecting
> > modules, but that isn't possible since includes-with-exec is tw
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. > wrote:
>
>> Joe Orton wrote:
>> >
>> > Having thought about this longer, I do agree that it would be reasonable
>> > to provide OPT_
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:59 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Having thought about this longer, I do agree that it would be reasonable
> > to provide OPT_INCNOEXEC as a noop integer for back-compat, but, it
> > turns out we're out of bits - allow_options_t is an unsigned
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Torsten Foertsch
wrote:
> On Fri 22 May 2009, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Hmmm, after trying to use what seems like a cool feature, I find that
> > mod_perl was never taught to use the Apache 2's mod_include plug-in
> > interface.
>
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. > wrote:
>
>> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> > Does somebody else care to share their opinion on this? Which of these
>> > are okay?
>> >
&g
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 3:08 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wrote:
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > Does somebody else care to share their opinion on this? Which of these
> > are okay?
> >
> > - existing mod_perl releases (and potentially other third-party modules)
&g
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:15:00AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:17 AM, wrote:
> >
> > > Author: covener
> > > Date: Tue May 12 13:17:29 2009
> > > New Revision: 773881
>
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:17 AM, wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Tue May 12 13:17:29 2009
> New Revision: 773881
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=773881&view=rev
> Log:
> backport 772997, 773322, 773342 from trunk.
> Reviewed By: jorton, rpluem, covener
>
> Security fix for CVE-2009-119
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Francois Pernet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have received the following vulnerability report:
> http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/23192/info
>
> I read the changes for the mod_perl versions but did not find anything
> really clear. We are using mod_perl version 2.0.3 compil
>The only issue I could see is if APR_WRITE was addeed
>at some point somewhat recently, and this change would break
>against older APRs.
APR_READ and/or APR_WRITE has been required since the first APR release.
Here's the logic to check for APR_READ/APR_WRITE back in 1999 (still called
"ap_open" a
23 matches
Mail list logo
