e
FreeBSD mailling list people. Maybe they know the next step?
- Original Message -
*From:* metacyc...@gmail.com <mailto:metacyc...@gmail.com>
*To:* Sin <mailto:sinis...@gmail.com>
*Cc:* Foo JH <mailto:jhfoo...@extracktor.com>
Just a thought: is install ap22 + mp2 + libapreq2 via pkg_add -r an
option? That's what I normally do these days.
Adam Prime wrote:
You guys might want to take a look at this thread on apreq-dev
http://marc.info/?t=12420765987&r=1&w=2
Specifically the last couple of posts from pgollucci
Damn, I left SF 3 weeks back. I'm never going to get to attend ApacheCon...
Fred Moyer wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Fred Moyer wrote:
Greetings,
Is anyone here attending ApacheCon in Oakland this year? I am
organizing
I've been - in my spare time - trying to figure this PSGI thing out. I'm
a Windows guy you see, and I realised there's no PPM for Plack.
Is Strawberry the only alternative?
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Oct 15, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Adam Prime wrote:
I haven't played with it, but i have read a bunc
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
WITH_MODPERL2=yes is std option used by many ports.
Also, you didn't read the output from www/mod_perl2 that tells you to
install it (www/p5-Apache-Relaod); though it doesn't mention the above var.
WITH_MODPERL2=yes will actually be dying sometime in 2010 and everything
I'm not sure if I remember right, but you may want to check out the
PerlOptions +Parent
option.
http://modperlbook.org/html/24-5-6-3-Parent.html
Artem Kuchin wrote:
I have run into a problem. I want to have my packages
precompiled in apache process with
PerlModule X:Y
X:Y is my own package w
Thanks Hiro,
I wonder: if nobody is to advise otherwise, how will one know out that
it is possible to install p5-Apache-Reload with the WITH_MODPERL2=yes
option, without digging into the make file?
Hiroyuki Hanai wrote:
just FYI.
I'm wondering if there is any1 using FreeBSD + Apache2 +
elds 'pass'. Subsequent CPAN 'test Apache2::Reload'
wants to use the same module, so it says 'Has already been
tested successfully'.
cmac
On Sep 3, 2009, at 3:59 AM, Foo JH wrote:
Hello guys,
I'm wondering if there is any1 using FreeBSD + Apache2 + mp2. In
s
Hello guys,
I'm wondering if there is any1 using FreeBSD + Apache2 + mp2. In short:
there's no Apache2::Reload.
I browsed around the web (in particular
http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@perl.apache.org/msg12048.html) , and
apparently I'm not the only one who noticed it. People mention
Apache
I'd suggest to get your mp2 up with the following stack:
Apache22 Windows binary
ActivePerl binary
precompiled mod_perl2 + libapreq2 from the repo
Michiel Beijen wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to know if it's possible to build mod_perl on Win32; I'd like
to use mod_perl with StrawberryPerl. It seems t
Hi guys,
There's recently some talk on the ActivePerl mailing list on Perl6
(Rakuda) and IIS. Out of curiosity, is anyone experimenting on this on
mod_perl6?
mod_perl6 was mentioned by Jeff Horwitz in the following articles:
1.
http://www.oreillynet.com/onlamp/blog/2008/02/jeff_horwitz_on_mod_per
Please do not reply to my comments. I think it's time to close this and
move on.
Ok, my personal summary on this topic:
1. The fact that so many people (including lurkers) responded to this
email suggests that it is a subject that's important to them - be it
personal, professional, or academic.
C
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> It seems that Perl is beaten by this new atitude, and the fact that it
> is a better language doesn't help too much.
Haven't we all learnt from Bush, that the best people don't always make
President?
> If the program is hard enough protected, most users won't be able to g
David Ihnen wrote:
> I suppose we need more programmers than those programmers who are just
> interested in coding? I never met a good programmer who wasn't
> intrinsically interested in it.
They like to program, then they realise that being a programmer means
been strangled by middle management.
Octavian Râsnita wrote:
> 1. I don't know what it means that perl supports more paradigms than
> Java, but I know that the Java / C# OOP style is usually considered
> a much complete and better standard than one used by Perl.
> Java / DotNet support interfaces, so the classes they c
Rolf Banting wrote:
> 1. Perl supports more programming paradigms than Java.
Agreed. The problem is with perception. People identify Perl as a
procedural language, and strongly typed languages (ie C#, Java) as
modern languages enforcing modern concepts. We all know that's isn't
entirely true of cou
David Ihnen wrote:
> I think you've got it right there. We've got to get perl taught in
> schools. That means perl experts need to be in teaching. And I have a
> suspicion that perl doesn't appeal to the pure computer scientist very
> well - these are the people who invented hard typed languages
Octavian Râsnita wrote:
> The actual perl programmers are not important, because they already have
> their reasons for using perl.
> Are you saying that nobody uses Zend Encoder because PHP also runs using
> an interpreter?
I'm changing the topic of your discussion because it's gone tangent to
the
> In my humble opinion the perl community needs to embrace the concept
> of self propagation. For the most part perl/oo perl/mod_perl
> developers are self taught. Junior or mid level talent (a majority
> of the talent pool) is passed over as not enough experience.
It is interestin
André Warnier wrote:
> I would like to add that it seems ridiculously simple to decompile Java
> classes.
Agreed. With the popularity of bytecode languages such as Java and .Net,
suddenly nobody talks about the ease of obtaining source code in the
flesh. As Andre mentioned, it's trivial to decompil
Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Octavian Râsnita wrote:
...and in most parts of the
>> world it is hard to find competent perl programmers.
>
> ...The job
> listings for Perl are strong. They're huge compared to those for
> Ruby. Of course Java is massively more popula
fREW Schmidt wrote:
> [Thu Jan 15 17:34:21 2009] [error] Can't locate Apache2/Reload.pm in
> @INC (@INC contains: C:/usr/site/lib C:/usr/lib . C:/Program
> Files/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2) at (eval 3) line 3.\n
> [Thu Jan 15 17:34:21 2009] [error] Can't load Perl module
> Apache2::Reloa
Adam Prime wrote:
> Foo JH wrote:
>> Adam Prime wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to find the class/ method which allows me to get the physical
>>>> path base on the uri. Something similar to Server.MapPath('/index.htm')
>>>> in ASP.NET.
>>>
Adam Prime wrote:
>> I'm trying to find the class/ method which allows me to get the physical
>> path base on the uri. Something similar to Server.MapPath('/index.htm')
>> in ASP.NET.
>>
>> Any advise is appreciated. Thanks.
>
> $r->document_root . $r->uri
Thanks for replying. In my case it's a we
Hi all,
I'm trying to find the class/ method which allows me to get the physical
path base on the uri. Something similar to Server.MapPath('/index.htm')
in ASP.NET.
Any advise is appreciated. Thanks.
Michael Ludwig wrote:
> I'd like to reach an understanding of what these ranges of modules and
> interfaces are intended for. When would I want to use which interface?
> Or is it all a matter of style and taste?
Possibly. You will need the standard modperl2 library to even get
modperl up and runn
Mark Hedges wrote:
> http://search.cpan.org/~markle/Apache2-Controller-1.000.001/
Very interesting. I have a controller which functions in a slightly
different way, but it's good to see alternative approaches. I think
yours makes life easier.
> Path:/usr/ports/www/libapreq2
> Path:/usr/ports/www/p5-libapreq
> Path:/usr/ports/www/p5-libapreq-static
> Path:/usr/ports/www/p5-libapreq2
> You'd want either p5-libapreq2 or p5-libapreq WITH_MODPERL2=yes
Thanks. Does the fact that libapreq can be installed w/o modperl mean
that
Ok I figured it out. Apparently to get libapreq2 up, one has to install:
1. /usr/ports/www/libapreq2
2. /usr/ports/www/p5-libapreq2
Foo JH wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm testing the latest mp2 stack on FreeBSD 7. While everything installs
> ok, I'm having difficulties locati
Hi all,
I'm testing the latest mp2 stack on FreeBSD 7. While everything installs
ok, I'm having difficulties locating the Apache2::Cookie module.
I understand Apache2::Cookie is part of the libapreq2 package. I
installed that via ports, and the installation did not report errors.
The module mod_a
Hi all,
Recently started testing the a/m stack. Happy to report: so far so good:
1. Apache can be restarted via ApacheMonitor.exe
2. Works with libapeq2.6.3
3. Survives multiple restarts
4. Works with Apache2::Reload
Disclaimer: I'm not hard-core mp2, so the tests are wy surface-grade .
A po
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Foo JH wrote:
>> Adam Prime wrote:
>>> The results of the mod_perl survey that Fred Moyer and I conducted can
>>> be found at the following link:
>> Interesting list. Any chance the workshop will come to Singapore? :)
>
Adam Prime wrote:
> The results of the mod_perl survey that Fred Moyer and I conducted can
> be found at the following link:
Interesting list. Any chance the workshop will come to Singapore? :)
I am strangely excited by the potential of filters. mod_perl feels like
a generic tool that can do more
It's quite simple really. You're running 2 instances of the script. To
retain the value of $counter, read up the mod_perl documentation for tips.
CthuMP wrote:
I have follow simple script:
!#/usr/bin/perl
print "Content-Type: text/html\n\n";
print "Counter: " . (++$counter) . "\n";
print tim
You may want to try 2 options:
1. Use an older version of the Apache build like 2.2.6. It has been
known to be fairly stable.
2. Try the build from ApacheLounge. It's generally not favoured, but it
seems to handle some things better.
greg augustine wrote:
Also, the ThreadsPerChild is 250 and
I use modPerl (not the CGI though), but I don't see this error even when
slapping things on notepad.
Perhaps the problem is something else?
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Joe Smoker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Seems like mod perl does not like the CRLF chars in the
Most will argue that it's not considered a framework per se, but I like
HTML::Template. It's more of a templating engine really.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found that Catalyst is too huge to use.
Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP
applications?
thanks.
--pe
michael watson (IAH-C) wrote:
Did you try GD::Graph?
GD::Graph is a good graphing tool. It can get quite low-level as well,
so you have to decide which visualiser works for you.
The advantage of GD::Graph is that it'd likely be rendered as a JPEG/
GIF, and that's something you can download
Rolf Schaufelberger wrote:
Am Sonntag, 22. Juni 2008 11:27:26 schrieb Malka Cymbalista:
We are running perl 5.8.5 on a Linux machine that is running apache 2.2.6
with mod_perl 2.0.3. Our data is in a MySQL database (MySQL 5.0.45)
We have been asked to write a web application that requires
kropotkin wrote:
Hi
I am trying to obtain POST data from a form.
Try LWP::UserAgent to post forms instead. It's quite easy to use.
Hello Perrin,
I would think that threads are more important to Win32 Perlies than
their Linux counterparts. To me, I use threads as often as I can to
maximise performance and scalability. To conclude, I can't agree with
your statement that people don't use threads.
william wrote:
On 5/21/0
Creating packages with the same name for multiple sites is generally a
recipe for confusion. Following what Michael Peters said, the better way
will be to create a properly namespaced package instead.
But in the event that the right thing cannot be done, you can consider
creating a new interpr
'Triad Personnel'? Do they pay in blood money?
Geoffrey Young wrote:
apparently, due diligence doesn't cover proper spelling or YELLING.
but for the interested...
--Geoff
Original Message
Subject: HELP-can you help me find MODPERL programmers? in BAY AREA
PLEEZE
Date: Tue
ue...
Issac
Foo JH wrote:
Alas, I have bad news to report:
Tech stack:
Windows 2003 Server
Apache 2.2.4
Perl 5.10.0
mod_perl 2.0.4 from 10xx/ path
Observations:
1. mod_perl is able to start
2. mod_perl is unable to survive an Apache restart signal
3. (relavant) error log available below:
[T
Alas, I have bad news to report:
Tech stack:
Windows 2003 Server
Apache 2.2.4
Perl 5.10.0
mod_perl 2.0.4 from 10xx/ path
Observations:
1. mod_perl is able to start
2. mod_perl is unable to survive an Apache restart signal
3. (relavant) error log available below:
[Thu Apr 17 23:39:34 2008] [noti
Fantastic! Can I assume that libapreq will be compatible with this version?
In all likelihood the only way is to try it yourself...
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
The mod_perl 2.0.4 release candidate 1 "Works with Perl 5.10" is
ready. It can be downloaded here:
http://www.apache.org/~gozer/mp2/m
What is a realserver?
J. Peng wrote:
hello list,
we have our own realserver called QHttpd.
This realserver doesn't support SSL protocal (https).
So I have to develop a proxy before QHttpd to get it be compatible with SSL.
I was thinking using modperl handler to do it.
modperl accept the SSL con
try print $template->output;
You forgot the print();
xyon wrote:
Hey everyone,
Firstly, I apologize I sent the previous email under an incorrect subject line.
I am working on my first Object-Oriented project, and have hit a slight
snag. I am using HTML::Template to output within the View modu
Where can one download the ppd from then? I don't see it in theoryx5.
Will be nice if we can install it as easily as modperl and libapreq...
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
On Feb 25, 2008, at 1:57 AM, Dami Laurent (PJ) wrote:
Hi Randy,
Thanks a lot, seems to work fine (but I didn't test very extens
Can be anything really, though I admit I'm not in the know. Sometimes
it's simply a business decision: perhaps moving development off-shore to
companies that are full of Java/ .NET people? Can't find enough
competent mp developers?
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
I've heard from a few reputable source
Thanks!
I mean for compiling for 5.10!
Randy Kobes wrote:
As there's been several requests for this, I've put up an
ActivePerl 10xx ppm package of mod_perl2, based on the
current svn sources, at
http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/PPMPackages/10xx/
which you can install via
C:\> ppm install
htt
oblem when restarting the server...)
When using a "Hello world" program with mod_perl, 822 is working fine
though.
Octavian
- Original Message - From: "Foo JH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mod_perl"
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 5:16 AM
Sub
Following the community's earlier comment on how modperl was compiled
against build 820 of ActivePerl, I've decided to check it out (since my
822 copy is acting up a little on my mp2 setup).
It's not that 822 is not good for 2.2.8. I'm able to restart the service
on a bare-bones config. But wi
Dylan,
Let's see: you have a client base who likes a staging-production
development scenario. There's a few ways you can play it out:
1. Different client, different code base
You use 2 machines: 1 for staging and the other for production. Set them
up exactly the same. Run your VirtualHost for
Randy,
I think characterizing the ASF binaries as unreliable with
mod_perl is misleading - there were some recent problems
with restarts, etc. on Win32 that have been looked into
and addressed for the 2.2.8 release.
The intent of my earlier response was not to undermine the quality of
the ASF b
I do keep my templates in other directories also.
1. If your directories are relative to the document root, and you can
take advantage of this fact by rendering a variable to remember the
template path.
2. If your template directories have nothing in common with the document
root, then you can
#x27;t you give it a try and see if you're having it better?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Foo JH wrote:
Andre,
I've recently set up a test based very closely on your platform:
AP2.2.8
AP5.8.8 Build 822
MP2.0.3
You mention a VC 2005 build of httpd, which build of MP? 2005?
Not sur
Hi all,
I've done some refactoring recently on my mp2 app (on Win32), and
succeeded in resolving the annoying startup issue (basically, does not
start up well).
I've documented my experience in the following url:
http://jhfoo.multiply.com/journal/item/163/Writing_a_startup_module_for_modperl_
Andre,
I've recently set up a test based very closely on your platform:
AP2.2.8
AP5.8.8 Build 822
MP2.0.3
The only diff is I got the AP2.2.8 binaries from ApacheLounge. It seems
to be quite stable so far, including service startups, Apache restarts etc.
André Warnier wrote:
Hi.
I just re-in
Read this:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/install.html
Jennifer G. wrote:
Hello,
How to install mp2 on windows XP? Does it need a VC complier? But I'm
not familiar with that complier and C/C++ language.
I have apache binary version installed but without modperl.thanks.
Isn't UserAgent just a header field? You can browse through the headers.
Jeff Pang wrote:
Hello,
what are the methods to get UserAgent setting in both mp1 and mp2?
I tried search,but got no results.
Thanks!
Regards,
Jeff Pang
I've swung back to 2.2.4 and things are much happier now.
Foo JH wrote:
Hi all,
Just want to slap a quick note that I've tried the following combo on
Win32 platform (Windows 2003 Server x86):
Apache 2.2.7 from ApacheLounge (apachelounge.com)
modperl 2.0.3 from theoryx5 (ppd)
libapreq
Hi all,
Just want to slap a quick note that I've tried the following combo on
Win32 platform (Windows 2003 Server x86):
Apache 2.2.7 from ApacheLounge (apachelounge.com)
modperl 2.0.3 from theoryx5 (ppd)
libapreq 2.6.2 from theoryx5 (ppd)
Perl 5.8.8 (ActivePerl build 822)
The only thing I'm in
Is there any value in receiving an incomplete upload? Are you better off
deciding how to avoid the timeout instead?
Malcolm wrote:
Is there any way to get some of the pieces of an incomplete multi-part post?
The situation I have is a client uploading multiple files as pieces of a POST,
but th
If you're running your scripts in Apache2::Registry, your scripts are
compiled on first go, and remain in memory subsequently.
When your script changes, the change should be detected, and
recompilation is automatic. IMHO this is a real time saver as
development goes.
do() is bad for speed op
Thinking from the perspective of the developer who tries very hard to
avoid dealing with C/C++, can the ApacheLounge patches and compilation
do the trick?
Caveat: have not read the dialog on the mailing list described.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Anyone following the dialog on [EMAIL PROTECTE
Firstly: mod_perl is a good choice. :) There are other languages out
there which can probably do the same job 90% of the time. But what you
have chosen is a language that is:
1. OS independent
2. Highly extensible via CPAN
3. Fast to cook, good to eat
It's not a question of whether you can do j
For what it's worth, I'm gonna try anyway...
I'm a Perl/ C# developer in Singapore with some 9 years in development,
looking forward to enjoy a career in a new culture and environment
(outside of Singapore). No criminal records, though some will claim I've
sinned for learning C# instead of Jav
Looking at the (albeit small) stream of entries to the mailing list, I'm
actually quite happy to notice that people are:
1. Still using modperl. Some newbie questions may suggest fresh blood...
2. Still using modperl on Win32 (despite the 'limitations'). Good news
for Microsoft, but I personally
Hello Noah,
I'm using FreeBSD as well, but I'm usually too scared to run cvsup
because that usually (almost always) will cause my make install to fail.
Can you confirm if you did a cvsup-nogui as well? Can you explain how
you do the 'apache configuration file update'?
Noah wrote:
thanks An
What is fast to cook, good to eat is HTML::Template. No XML, easy
abstraction between your web designer and developer.
Tyler Bird wrote:
Hi List,
Hey I was wondering if there was any MVC framework that anybody on
this list could point
me to that work work well with mod_perl.
We are having d
PerlHandler ModPerl::Registry
PerlSendHeader On
Earlier in the conf, I'm doing:
PerlSwitches -IX:/perl/5.8.8/site/lib
PerlInitHandler Apache2::Reload
PerlHandler ModPerl::Registry
-----Original Message-
From: Foo JH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Octo
What's your modperl config like?
Ian G. Tyndall wrote:
Ok, I decided to upgrade my Apache to see if that would fix things.
I installed 2.2.4, and I was getting the same error as originally
reported... but more often.
Then, I upgraded to 2.2.6 from the Apachelounge... and now I'm getting
an erro
Why don't you read about what's new in 2.2:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/new_features_2_2.html
Jeff Pang wrote:
Hello,
Does apache2.2+mp2 have much advantage than apache2.0+mp2?
2007/10/4, Foo JH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
You may want to hold back on 2.2.6. Use either 2
You may want to hold back on 2.2.6. Use either 2.2.4 from ASF or 2.2.5
from ApacheLounge.
Tracy E Schreiber wrote:
Hi,
I believe that mod_perl 2.0.3 is not compatible with Apache 2.2.6. Starting
Apache gives this error:
httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 31 of D:/Apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot
Sorry man, I'm not too familiar with Catalyst, so I can't pinpoint the
problem. But if your tests are good with a clean install of Apache2 +
mp2, you may want to check compiler used to build Catalyst (see Randy's
email on the VC used for ActivePerl, Apache, and modperl). I suppose
Catalyst is n
I haven't looked into this, but the fact that AL's
mod_perl (compiled, presumably, with VC8) doesn't
work with, again presumably, ActivePerl (compiled
with VC6) may be another example of the dangers
of mixing components compiled with VC6 and VC8.
Point taken.
Because you used theoryx5's perl/modperl/libapreq2 built for VC8, along with
the AL build of 2.2.4 ALSO built for VC8, everything is dandy.
Equally if you used ActiveState perl (built VC6) + a VC6 build of modperl and
libapreq2 with the ASF distribution of httpd 2.2.4, everything is dandy.
I
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Regarding the best Apache for Windows, I have a problem running Apache
under
windows and I think this thread might help me.
I tried Apache 2.2.4 with and without SSL support, and Apache 2.2.6 from
apachelounge, but they still don't work.
I'm using 2.2.4 now on Win32, and
Right. Except there is no 2.2.5;
2.2.5 is not released on the Apache web site. Those who want this
version can get it at ApacheLounge.
Of course 2.2.4 essentially worked, while 2.2.7 will give the modperl'ers
on Windows something they have BEGGED for forever, the chance to see parsing
error
Hi all,
Just want to share something I read today (fairly old news) at ApacheLounge:
http://www.apachelounge.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1907
Since many (most?) people who use Apache from Apache Lounge also use
mod_fcgid and/or mod_perl, it seems that 2.2.5 will remain the best
Apache version to
Is there a qn to this?
Perl wrote:
I have two different pages having different form. All the forms are having
the same Action(input.htm). I need to modify the code such that that the
details can be recorded in the database only after parsing the second page
.That means for the first page it sho
aqua wrote:
Thanks for your email. I am actually looking for current "mod perl" related
tutorials and not just Perl related. This HoptScripts site contains 3 mod_perl related
tutorials and they are very old (2000).
Why not drop by Amazon and pick up the mod_perl 2 book instead? It's
just relea
You can consider ImageMagick. It works on standard Perl apps as well.
Eli Shemer wrote:
Hey there
What replacement do I have for Apache::GD to work on mod_perl 2 ?
Thanks.
I've been waiting for this book for the longest time...
Stas Bekman wrote:
Hi everybody,
Jim Brandt, Allison Randal and I are happy to announce that the first
book about mod_perl2: The "mod_perl2 User's Guide" has been published
and available for purchase. See the book's site:
http://modperl
I've had this same experience on Win32 Apache 2 as well. It could be
related to the MPM model that the Win32 implementation employs.
Tobias Zeising wrote:
Hi all,
I have a weird problem: on startup apache executes 4 times a Perl Script
I included via
PerlPostConfigRequire startup.pl
in the
What's the error msg you see?
Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following code run without problems under Apache 1.3.29, Perl 5.6.1,
> mod_perl 1.29.
>
> Under the new environment which is Apache 2.0.52, Perl 5.8.8, mod_perl
> 2.0.3 ( Cent OS 4.5 ), it won't run.
>
> I have read through mod_
Hello Perrin,
I'm interested in how you defined your handler with the 'method' attribute:
sub handler : method {
...
I've read http://perldoc.perl.org/attributes.html about attributes, but
it does not seem to suggest that tagging the method attribute to
subroutine has any programming advantage
So on the first case,we need to write the handler as
sub handler { my $r = shift; ...}
because Apache may call the function directly as Package::Name::handler.
on the second case,we write handler as,
sub handler { my $class = shift; my $r = shift; ... }
because '->' is a method calling.
Am I
Read up on this document and other related ones:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html
Read this also:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/os/win32/index.html
usha rani wrote:
hi,
We would like to have information regarding configuration of
MOD_PERL 2.0.3 with Apache Server
This might be a result of what was mentioned before about possible
problems using the binaries from http://www.apachelounge.com/download/
(which is compiled with VC++ 2005) with ActivePerl and
ActivePerl-compatible ppm packages (which are compiled with VC++ 6).
Mixing these can lead to conf
Actually note that it isn't a release and is being rerolled. Seems
Apachelounge is doing themselves and their users a disservice, again.
I disagree. ApacheLounge's binary distribution is the only one that
(configured with modperl) survives an application restart. As I posted
in an earlier
Hi all,
While ApacheLounge makes available a Win32 binary of Apache2.2 that
seems to work better for modperl than the distribution from apache.com,
be advised that if you intend to use libapreq2, you may not want to use
the mod_perl binary from ApacheLounge.
I don't have the technical detail
Hi all,
Earlier on I was sharing the discovery of an alternative binary for
Apache on Win32 at Apache Lounge (http://http://www.apachelounge.com).
Here are some updates on the implementation:
1. There are binaries for Apache 2.2 and modperl2, but none for
libapreq2. The ppd from theoryx5 wor
any problems (except having to tweak different parameters).
So I cross my fingers and hope it will stay this way.
Not much of help for you I know, but I remember we have talked about
this before
Regards
Henrik Schak Hansen
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Foo JH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
William, the point I was trying to make is:
1. My restart test scope merely loads modperl + libapreq. There is ZERO
application code loaded. In other words, all I did after installing
modperl + libapreq is to ONLY load them into httpd.conf:
LoadFile c:/Perl/bin/perl58.dll
LoadModule perl_modul
od_perl.so
LoadFile bin/libapreq2.dll
LoadModule apreq_module modules/mod_apreq2.so
Apache/ modperl starts up fine, but if I try to restart the service, it
will not survive.
Please share with me any tips to improve the situation. I'm open to any
ideas.
Thanks.
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On
still not good enough. Apache must still be
able to perform a restart on its own.
Any suggestions?
Foo JH wrote:
Hi all,
I am rather disappointed (and a little frustrated as well) on
modperl's inability to survive an Apache restart on the Windows
platform. The platform combo tested are Windo
fare I haven't
experienced any problems (except having to tweak different parameters).
So I cross my fingers and hope it will stay this way.
Not much of help for you I know, but I remember we have talked about
this before
Regards
Henrik Schak Hansen
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: F
Hi all,
I am rather disappointed (and a little frustrated as well) on modperl's
inability to survive an Apache restart on the Windows platform. The
platform combo tested are Windows 2003 + Apache 2.2 (and Apache 2.0) +
modperl2 + libapreq2
I have come to accept the fact that once in a while
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
