I'm looking at the information in mod_perl 2 User's Guide (and online)
about using VirtualHost and +Parent, with an ithreads-enabled Perl, in
order to be able to modify @inc by virtualserver. On my system I
basically have that setup, and have tried it, and it seems to work fine
(I tried it with p
Hi, on an internal system I have a slightly older apache/mod_perl setup
running & we're seeing the segmentation fault exit (11) issue
(http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:yRtrb5W_BdUJ:modperlbook.org/html/
22-3-3-exit-signal-Segmentation-fault-11.html+%22exit+signal+Segmentatio
n%22+mod_perl&hl=en
Ok, point taken I'll give her a go and see what happens. Thanks
guys
-Original Message-
From: Carl Johnstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 5:44 PM
To: modperl@perl.apache.org
Subject: Re: Are RHEL 3.0 & mod_perl 2.0.x compatible?
Jonathan Vanasco wr
Oh, heh heh, good point I should have mentioned that I'm way back
in the Clinton/Gore software era because we still have customers on RHEL
3. The difference is the jump to apache2/mod_perl2 from 1.3/1, that
I've been tasked with. Off to a great start...heh. I was hoping to get
some good adv
Hi folks,
Been a few years since I've worked on mod_perl & I could use a helping
hand. Does anyone know if RHEL 3.0 and mod_perl 2.0.x (like 2.0.2) are
more or less compatible? RHEL 3.0 ships with that semi-mutant 1.99
development track mod_perl I tried upgrading (on an x86_64
arch)
