Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-25 Thread David Radunz
ote: > > David Radunz wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > I think that you have just uncovered a small bug in the unload_package() > > implementation > > and I'd like to know exactly how you've reproduced this. After looking > > over code, it is

Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-19 Thread David Radunz
Philippe I know your buisy with mod_perl 2 stuff at the moment, but I hope you get a chance to look at this when your free - unless the author of the code is someone else and you just recommended it? Anyway, Let me know. David On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 12:25, David Radunz wrote: > Further to t

Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-10 Thread David Radunz
Further to that - I just tested with an even bigger string and this one did get cleared fine, so it musnt be the size :( Not sure what the problem is, DJ On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 12:13, David Radunz wrote: > Hey, > > Thanks for your help. I tried using Devel::Unload to see how it wo

Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-10 Thread David Radunz
a huge SQL statement, about 2000 characters). Perhaps the scalar was too big to be cleared? Cheers, DJ On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 09:08, Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: > Stas Bekman wrote: > > > David Radunz wrote: > > > >> Hi All, > >> > >> I have looked hi

Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-04 Thread David Radunz
On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 12:39, Stas Bekman wrote: > David Radunz wrote: > > Heya Stas, > > > > I like that alot, as you say heaps cleaner. For the time being thou > > can you see any problems with us using my patch internally? > > Looks fine to me. >

Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-04 Thread David Radunz
ported under Apache::PerlRun? Cheers On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 11:34, Stas Bekman wrote: > David Radunz wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I have looked high and low to work out how to avoid the 'Constant > > subroutine redefined' warnings in the error log, followed by

Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-04 Thread David Radunz
they arent setup using constant.pm, rather pointers set to the reference of the parent package. So this is the only way I can think of. Thanks for your feedback On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 03:29, Perrin Harkins wrote: > On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 08:15, David Radunz wrote: > > My patch: > >

Re: Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-03 Thread David Radunz
Also forgot to mention, this is running: mod_perl 1.29 perl 5.8.4 apache 1.3.27 and .. SunOS *** 5.9 Generic_112234-08 i86pc i386 i86pc Cheers On Mon, 2004-10-04 at 16:15, David Radunz wrote: > Hi All, > > I have looked high and low to work out how to avoid the 'Constan

Apache::PerlRun - Constant subroutine redefined

2004-10-03 Thread David Radunz
time each request, and the same process id. as did.. my $time_constant = sub () { time. ' '. $$ }; print STDERR 'var time_constant = '. &{$time_constant}. "\n"; Sorry this email is a tad long, but its quite complicated to explain. Cheers, -- David Radun