On Sunday 25 June 2006 07:27, peter pilsl wrote:
> Is anyone using GDGraph under mod_perl? While things are working perfect
> under cgi, I get seg-faults under mod_perl.
>
> I didnt dig deeper by now and just wanted to ask if anyone here knows
> about GDGraph under mod_perl.
Do you have mod_php lo
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Peter Mogensen wrote:
Yes. But the above version is what ships with Sarge (unfortunately) due
to the API change, and I would need a very good reason to upgrade to the
new API at present. So if there was a simple explanation, which I could
solve by a slight modifictation to o
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 01:17 am, LUKE wrote:
> Will i need recomplie apache when i modify my (perl)code , when using
> non-DSO mod_perl?
No. Static mod_perl simply means that the mod_perl module that runs your Perl
code is compiled in as part of Apache itself, rather than being a runtime
ex
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Usually circular references like this are not a problem in Perl. The
only issue I know of is when you try to use imported subs or variables
at compile time.
Generally, this is true. Do beware though of code that may lean on perl's
grammar a bit much:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 13:43 -0600, Chase Venters wrote:
What was happening? The application had been taking
messages into the queue, promising the call generator to handle them. Thus
the queue kept growing, and growing, and growing...
That is what
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Perrin Harkins wrote:
processes free for accepting jobs (as opposed to processing jobs). If
there are not, it adds the job to the queue and goes back to listening
for requests. If there are, it processes the job. This ensures that
processing jobs does not starve the abilit
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Perrin Harkins wrote:
It will probably be big. Perl structures tend to use several times the
size of the actual data they store.
That's what I'm worried about then I suppose.
is this root hash, its keys / values / etc stored along with variables, or is
it in the op tree
On Thursday 15 December 2005 03:35 pm, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Not a great way to start your post. Please read this:
> http://modperlbook.org/html/ch10_01.html
My apologies. I do own the book and I have read it, but it was some time ago
and I didn't remember that some of my questions were addres
easonably. I suppose the only other
thing I have to be concerned about if the above idea will work is how long
the "_get_Big_Data_Structure" call would take.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Chase Venters
