Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl-2.0.11

2019-10-11 Thread Edward J. Sabol
On Oct 11, 2019, at 3:59 PM, Steve Hay wrote: >> Is the consensus that these test failures are innocuous and >> it's OK to upgrade anyway? > > I believe so, especially since the same failures existed in 2.0.9 and > 2.0.10, so at least aren't a new issue if that's what you're upgrading > from. Ex

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl-2.0.11

2019-10-11 Thread Steve Hay
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 20:49, Edward J. Sabol wrote: > > Hello. I'm seeing the same failures in > > t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 3) > Failed tests: 22, 26, 30 > > that others reported with the release candidates. Those are > the only failures. This is when bu

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mod_perl-2.0.11

2019-10-11 Thread Edward J. Sabol
Hello. I'm seeing the same failures in t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 3) Failed tests: 22, 26, 30 that others reported with the release candidates. Those are the only failures. This is when building with Apache 2.4.41 on RHEL. All tests pass if I build with Ap