On Oct 11, 2019, at 3:59 PM, Steve Hay wrote:
>> Is the consensus that these test failures are innocuous and
>> it's OK to upgrade anyway?
>
> I believe so, especially since the same failures existed in 2.0.9 and
> 2.0.10, so at least aren't a new issue if that's what you're upgrading
> from.
Ex
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 20:49, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
>
> Hello. I'm seeing the same failures in
>
> t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 3)
> Failed tests: 22, 26, 30
>
> that others reported with the release candidates. Those are
> the only failures. This is when bu
Hello. I'm seeing the same failures in
t/filter/in_bbs_inject_header.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 3)
Failed tests: 22, 26, 30
that others reported with the release candidates. Those are
the only failures. This is when building with Apache 2.4.41 on
RHEL. All tests pass if I build with Ap