Yes, that's an artifact of the phase in which we handle the remoteip
transposition. It could be slightly earlier which is why I raised the
question to the httpd dev community.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:31 AM, JW wrote:
>
> Don't know the answer to your question about remoteip ...
>
> However, wh
Don't know the answer to your question about remoteip ...
However, what I noted is that the Apache remoteip module,
when configured with "RemoteIPHeader X-Forwarded-For", deletes the
X-Forwarded-For header.
In the PerlPostReadRequestHandler stage, the X-Forwarded-For headerexists and
it seems
This has occurred in multiple contexts, including throwing segfaults in the
modperl test framework (connection handler, so no req_rec.)
Wondering if remoteip might be able to run a little bit earlier? This is all
relevant to what we are discussing about PROXY protocol enhancements.
On Mon, Mar 13
