There's compatibility list - seems quite good to use in production:
http://docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/misc/browser-compatibility.html
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> This mathml and asciimath is extremely interesting! Thank you! You are
> awesome!
>
> I was a little unclea
Mathjax is the best for math display on the web. The mathematics
professional societies use it, as do major projects like webwork (
github.com/openwebwork, webwork.maa.org) and Sage (sagemath.org).
On Sunday, September 11, 2016, Igor Chudov wrote:
> This mathml and asciimath is extremely intere
This mathml and asciimath is extremely interesting! Thank you! You are
awesome!
I was a little unclear what browsers it works with, I would have to do some
testing. I hope that it is compatible with all modern browsers and cell
phones and such. If not it would not work, but if it is then I would b
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> > GD::Graph is something that is not going to kill me (like if CGI.pm
> became
> > unavailable) but it is certainly a concern.
> >
> > Are there any alternatives to it?
> >
> imagemajic maybe
>
It also make sense to try something like this:
h
On 09/11/2016 07:43 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> you are right.
>
> It does not even compile correctly any more due to some stupid and
> incorrect logic in Makefile.PL related to major and minor perl versions. I
> have to edit Makefile.PL prior to compiling it.
>
> It has no real future, sadly.
>
>
you are right.
It does not even compile correctly any more due to some stupid and
incorrect logic in Makefile.PL related to major and minor perl versions. I
have to edit Makefile.PL prior to compiling it.
It has no real future, sadly.
GD::Graph is something that is not going to kill me (like if
On 09/11/2016 05:36 PM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> Examples of graphics are here:
>
> https://www.algebra.com/services/rendering/
>
> I draw these pictures on the fly using GD::Graph, by parsing formulas and
> rendering them in proper notation.
GD Graph might be a longer term problem than CGI.pm
--
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 09/11/2016 11:38 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> > About maybe half of those responses are images generated by
> mod_perl/CGI.pm
> > scripts that draw pictures of math formulas like x/(x+1) etc.
> >
> > I agree that running CGI.pm inside true CGI
CGI.pm is still good - but i you are using modperl "properly" then it is
worth look at APR, which when you use CGI.pm under mod_perl it is what
is used under the hood... and is faster than CGI (one less level of
abstraction) although there is a minor bug in it - in that is broken if
you use mod
On 09/11/2016 11:38 AM, Igor Chudov wrote:
> About maybe half of those responses are images generated by mod_perl/CGI.pm
> scripts that draw pictures of math formulas like x/(x+1) etc.
>
> I agree that running CGI.pm inside true CGI scripts (one process per every
> web object) is expensive. Runnin
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:46:52AM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> > Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have
> > mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful.
> >
> > Take a look at your own website coinhang
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:46:52AM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have
> mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful.
>
> Take a look at your own website coinhangout.com. It is down right now. But
> take a look at its google c
I ca only speak for Dancer2 - I imagine they are all similar
> On 11 Sep 2016, at 15:55, Igor Chudov wrote:
>
> Eugene, sorry for my ignorant questions.
>
> I see several of these frameworks.
>
> Is that correct that the result of setting up and programming the framework
> is a running perl sc
Eugene, sorry for my ignorant questions.
I see several of these frameworks.
Is that correct that the result of setting up and programming the framework
is a running perl script?
It needs a reverse proxy in front of it? (I use nginx as a reverse proxy).
Does nginx proxy to those?
Do you need se
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 09:46:52AM -0500, Igor Chudov wrote:
> Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have
> mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful.
>
> Take a look at your own website coinhangout.com. It is down right now. But
> take a look at its google c
Ruben, thank you for your opinion. You have your own opinion and I have
mine, and that is what makes the Internet beautiful.
Take a look at your own website coinhangout.com. It is down right now. But
take a look at its google cache:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache%3Awww.coinh
-Original Message-
From: Ruben Safir
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 11:58 PM
Just for the record, this is not correct and I think time has proven
that integrating language into the html output has resulted in a Marjory
of active server pages. [snip]
I just have a distaste for
Title: Re: Alternatives to CGI perl module
Hi, Igor.
You may try http://mojolicious.org/
Вы писали 10 сентября 2016 г., 15:54:44:
I hope that this message would not be considered off topic.
I have been developing web apps since 1996 and have about 84,000 lines of perl code implementing
not for our application
I remember some 2 or 3 years ago I posted a topic for this on the forum,
but it was not answered
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Ruben Safir wrote:
> On 09/11/2016 02:35 AM, Eric Aarts wrote:
> > Only non-issue – and only on stopping/restarting service apache2 – are
> >
19 matches
Mail list logo
