On Wed, 18 May 2016 09:35:45 -0400
Lathan Bidwell wrote:
> Is it possible that its not a problem of the rand, but a problem of the ||=
> ?
>
> Try debugging the value before you set it. It could be a scoping issue
> where the old value stays in the variable and then ||= doesn't overwrite it.
>
On Tue, 10 May 2016 09:13:27 -0500
Hiram Gibbard wrote:
> If I want to recompile the mod_perl module so that it points to a custom
> Perl location, is it as simply as editing the following line:
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
Better off using the path to locate perl:
#!/bin/env perl
will do this o
Is it possible that its not a problem of the rand, but a problem of the ||=
?
Try debugging the value before you set it. It could be a scoping issue
where the old value stays in the variable and then ||= doesn't overwrite it.
*Lathan Bidwell*
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Vincent Veyron wr
On Wed, 18 May 2016 09:12:17 +0200
André Warnier wrote:
> Maybe you can try a BEGIN block. If I remember correctly, under mod_perl (if
> you run under
> "registry" to keep the compiled cgi-bin in memory), a BEGIN block should be
> run only once,
> when the script is first compiled (by this ch
On 18.05.2016 01:23, Vincent Veyron wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2016 20:41:28 +0200
demerphq wrote:
If you fork before you call (s)rand then each child process will have
their own copy of the flag, which will be false, and thus will cause
srand() to be called in the subprocess properly.
So now I'
