Re: Connection aborted was ModPerl::Util::exit: (120000) exit was called at /usr/share/perl5/CGI/Carp.pm line 590

2012-11-14 Thread André Warnier
Dave Morgan wrote: Original Message Thank you Andre, On 31/10/12 01:58 PM, André Warnier wrote: > Dave Morgan wrote: >> How do I find out where the following call(s) are made from? > > See http://search.cpan.org/~dom/perl-5.14.3/lib/Carp.pm > or by including the string -M

Connection aborted was ModPerl::Util::exit: (120000) exit was called at /usr/share/perl5/CGI/Carp.pm line 590

2012-11-14 Thread Dave Morgan
Original Message Thank you Andre, On 31/10/12 01:58 PM, André Warnier wrote: > Dave Morgan wrote: >> How do I find out where the following call(s) are made from? > > See http://search.cpan.org/~dom/perl-5.14.3/lib/Carp.pm > or by including the string -MCarp=verbose in the PERL5

Re: question on sub-requests

2012-11-14 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On 11/14/2012 03:53 PM, André Warnier wrote: > The tidbit above makes me think about a possibility to solve another > issue that happens from time to time : some users browsers that are NOT > refreshing their copies of stylesheets or javascript libraries, even > though they have been modified. > No

Re: question on sub-requests

2012-11-14 Thread André Warnier
Torsten Förtsch wrote: On 11/14/2012 02:48 PM, André Warnier wrote: I my particular case, the sendfile() solution above works fine, because I am sure in this case that no additional processing needs to take place on those static pages. What I meant in particular was the HTTP code 304 generatio

Re: question on sub-requests

2012-11-14 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On 11/14/2012 02:48 PM, André Warnier wrote: > I my particular case, the sendfile() solution above works fine, because > I am sure in this case that no additional processing needs to take place > on those static pages. What I meant in particular was the HTTP code 304 generation. With your solution

Re: question on sub-requests

2012-11-14 Thread André Warnier
Torsten Förtsch wrote: On 11/13/2012 07:17 PM, André Warnier wrote: I didn't want to take too much time of anyone before, which is why I somewhat oversimplified the issue. But considering the traffic on the lis os low, maybe you want to hear the whole story after all. The basic case is this :

Re: question on sub-requests

2012-11-14 Thread Torsten Förtsch
On 11/13/2012 07:17 PM, André Warnier wrote: > I didn't want to take too much time of anyone before, which is why I > somewhat oversimplified the issue. But considering the traffic on the > lis os low, maybe you want to hear the whole story after all. > > The basic case is this : a bit aside from