Re: compiling mod_perl 1x + Apache 1 on Debian

2012-02-29 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:16:44PM +0100, Michael Ludwig wrote: > > Configuring for Apache, Version 1.3.42 > > + Warning: Your 'echo' command is slightly broken. > > + It interprets escape sequences per default. We already > > + tried 'echo -E' but had no real success. If errors occur > >

Re: Using Apache v1

2012-02-29 Thread Chris Olive
Last I checked, Apache was still providing patches and releases for the v1 base as well. There are a lot of people still using it, at least that is also my perception. chris - *Chris Olive* | *Principal Consultant* | TechnologEase LLC *email*: ch...@technologeas

Re: PHP Question

2012-02-29 Thread Michael Ludwig
Jim Schueler schrieb am 29.02.2012 um 09:04 (-0500): > When someone asks me the difference between PHP and Perl. I usually > respond that the PHP's core API is bigger by a magnitude of 2. I > estimate the core PHP api is around 10K functions. Don't exaggerate. :) PHP is dull and boring. Not an

Re: compiling mod_perl 1x + Apache 1 on Debian

2012-02-29 Thread Michael Ludwig
Thomas Klausner schrieb am 29.02.2012 um 10:20 (+0100): > ~/apache_1.3.42$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/apache1 > > Configuring for Apache, Version 1.3.42 > + Warning: Your 'echo' command is slightly broken. > + It interprets escape sequences per default. We already > + tried 'echo -E' but had no

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
On 29 Feb 2012, at 19:33, Dan Axtell wrote: > > Basically I want to have various virtual hosts be reverse proxied to various > back end servers (e.g. mod_perl for some legacy apps, a Catalyst app under > fast CGI). I tried this with Nginx and it all seemed to work but what I > discovered is

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Dan Axtell wrote: > Basically I want to have various virtual hosts be reverse proxied to various > back end servers (e.g. mod_perl for some legacy apps, a Catalyst app under > fast CGI).  I tried this with Nginx and it all seemed to work but what I > discovered is

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Dan Axtell
> > There's also a talk I gave a couple of years ago about non-plack > options, like nginx+fastcgi: > http://elem.com/~perrin/web_arch.pdf.gz > Thanks for posting this. I understand the general idea of having a lightweight server on port 80 to handle static content and reverse proxying to ano

how does mod_perl handle client certificates

2012-02-29 Thread Jim Schueler
How does mod_perl handle client certificates using the Apache object? Thanks!

PHP Question

2012-02-29 Thread Jim Schueler
At least one person in yesterday's discussion wondered if mod_perl might be obsolete given the overwhelming dominance of PHP. I just want to share a few observations. When someone asks me the difference between PHP and Perl. I usually respond that the PHP's core API is bigger by a magnitude

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-29 Thread Vincent Veyron
Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 17:27 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jan Dubois wrote: > > I find this talk an excellent overview of all the different ways to > > deploy Perl (PSGI) applications: > > > > http://www.slideshare.net/miyagawa/deploying-plack-web-applicat

compiling mod_perl 1x + Apache 1 on Debian

2012-02-29 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! A rather old legacy projects need to be recompiled, but neither mod_perl nor Apache seem to be compilable. Any hints/ideas? ~$ uname -a Linux laptop 3.2.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 17 05:17:36 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux (same on: Linux server 2.6.26-2-openvz-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 13 17:16:12 UTC