Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Jan Dubois wrote: > I find this talk an excellent overview of all the different ways to > deploy Perl (PSGI) applications: > > http://www.slideshare.net/miyagawa/deploying-plack-web-applications-oscon-2011-8706659 There's also a talk I gave a couple of years ago a

RE: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Jan Dubois
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Vincent Veyron wrote: > Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 13:46 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit : > > > Even if mod_perl someday stops being developed for new versions of > > perl and apache, there will be no immediate need to move off it and > > plenty of alternatives available. > > Do

Re: Runtime access control by url

2012-02-28 Thread André Warnier
Carl Franks wrote: Hi, I'm currently handling access control with "AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd". I'd like to get rid of the growing list of directives in our httpd.conf and lookup each request url against a database, to check whether it requires a login. Visitors should be able to browse the web

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent Veyron
Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 13:46 -0500, Perrin Harkins a écrit : > Even if mod_perl someday stops being developed for new versions of > perl and apache, there will be no immediate need to move off it and > plenty of alternatives available. > Do you think nginx+perl could be one of those alternat

Using Apache v1

2012-02-28 Thread Dave Morgan
On 28/02/12 11:59 AM, Randolf Richardson wrote: Snip Are a lot of people still using the version 1 series of httpd and/or mod_perl? Lots :) My codebase is apache/mod-perl independent and yet we still have v1 servers around. Hardware upgrades are scheduled for later this year or next

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Randolf Richardson
> 2012/2/28 Vincent Veyron : > > I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and > > pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a > > hurry :-( I depend on mod_perl2 for nearly all the web sites that I maintain, and I've been trying to encourage

Re: Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Perrin Harkins
2012/2/28 Vincent Veyron : > I am a tiny one-man company using mod_perl with great success(*) and > pleasure, and your post has me very worried that it could end in a > hurry :-( Don't panic! There's no immediate danger to mod_perl, and most people are not trying to run on the very latest version

Funding [WAS :Re: trying to compile mod_perl against httpd-2.4.1]

2012-02-28 Thread Vincent Veyron
Le mercredi 22 février 2012 à 13:37 +0100, Torsten Förtsch a écrit : > Unfortunately, last year generated quite a lot of work. There was perl 5.14 > with a few incompatible changes and the upcoming httpd 2.4. Not to forget the > transition from LWP 5.x to LWP 6.x which our test-suite is based up

Runtime access control by url

2012-02-28 Thread Carl Franks
Hi, I'm currently handling access control with "AuthBasicProvider ldap dbd". I'd like to get rid of the growing list of directives in our httpd.conf and lookup each request url against a database, to check whether it requires a login. Visitors should be able to browse the website without an accou