Re: No $r = no mod_perl?

2011-07-10 Thread Tosh Cooey
Sorry, false alarm... I had subclassed Apache2::AuthCookieDBI 2.12 and had to do things like this: *Apache2::AuthCookieDBI::_dbi_connect = sub { since Apache2::AuthCookieDBI wasn't very subclassable, and with the upgrade to a very nice Apache2::AuthCookieDBI 2.14 my whatever I did up there br

Re: No $r = no mod_perl?

2011-07-10 Thread Matisse Enzer
Do you have a configuration similar to this in httpd.conf: AuthType Apache2::AuthCookieDBI AuthName WhatEver PerlAuthenHandler Apache2::AuthCookieDBI->authenticate PerlAuthzHandler Apache2::AuthCookieDBI->authorize require valid-user # or you

Re: No $r = no mod_perl?

2011-07-10 Thread Hendrik Schumacher
Maybe you are using the wrong sethandler value for your application, check http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/config/config.html#C_GlobalRequest_ If you are using a global $r variable you should specify SetHandler perl-script and not SetHandler modperl Using the latter you get the $r variab

linux glibc and new "Sandy Bridge" AVX processors

2011-07-10 Thread MK
After digging further into my problem with the SIGILL on an openVZ slice -- thanks much Rick Myers for the tip -- I'm trying to find out who, if anyone, is running mod_perl on an AVX enabled hardware. According to wikipedia, the only currently available processor using these extensions is the new

Re: No $r = no mod_perl?

2011-07-10 Thread Adam Prime
On 7/10/2011 6:08 AM, Tosh Cooey wrote: So I'm following your advice and going the easy route of apt-get everything. My original server had this config: Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu) mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 Server And two years later we're at: Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 Ser

Re: SIGILL on openVZ

2011-07-10 Thread MK
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 08:07:05 -0400 Rick Myers wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 09:05:28AM -0400, MK wrote: > > http://pastebin.com/16SrEzHM > > > > The offending instruction is "dl_x86_64_save_sse" (I don't know any > > assembly), and it is always from > > /usr/src/debug/glibc-2.12.2/sysdeps/x8

Re: mod_perl EC2 AMI's or other platform providers?

2011-07-10 Thread Dave Hodgkinson
Also, I believe DotCloud has Miyagawa on board which is a big win IMHO. Legend has it he had perl support shipped two days after joining. Or something. I'm about to put a Catalyst app on it so we'll see how that flies. On 10 Jul 2011, at 11:28, Tosh Cooey wrote: > Mr. Hodgkinson was awesome eno

Re: Re: mod_perl EC2 AMI's or other platform providers?

2011-07-10 Thread Tosh Cooey
Mr. Hodgkinson was awesome enough to point out the existence of DotCloud: https://docs.dotcloud.com/#perl.html Looks there like they have a Perl stack available, which is super for the world but not so for me since the stack requires you use PSGI which is a great approach but since I don't req

No $r = no mod_perl?

2011-07-10 Thread Tosh Cooey
So I'm following your advice and going the easy route of apt-get everything. My original server had this config: Apache/2.2.11 (Ubuntu) mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0 Server And two years later we're at: Apache/2.2.14 (Ubuntu) mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1 Server Is that really the state of two year