According to Perrin Harkins on Fri, 06/17/11 at 15:35:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:20 PM, William Bulley wrote:
> > Recall that all I'm trying to do at this point is to get the apache
> > server up and running. ?The fact that these two lines in this include
> > file of this particular applicati
> I'm interested in hearing about what application frameworks (Catalyst,
> CGI::App, Mojolicious) are used here with mod_perl. Given the number
> of emerging Perl based webservers on CPAN (in addition to Nginx,
> lighty, etc), it seems like there are many more Perl web application
> and webservers
According to Fred Moyer on Fri, 06/17/11 at 16:22:
>
> I think Perrin is right, I've never seen -compile syntax used in
> PerlModule directives. Move the PerlModule directives into a
> startup.pl file.
>
> In your httpd.conf:
>
> LoadModule perl_modulemodules/mod_perl.so
> PerlPostConfi
I think Perrin is right, I've never seen -compile syntax used in
PerlModule directives. Move the PerlModule directives into a
startup.pl file.
In your httpd.conf:
LoadModule perl_modulemodules/mod_perl.so
PerlPostConfigRequire /my/startup.pl
In your startup.pl:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use str
According to Fred Moyer on Fri, 06/17/11 at 13:43:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:29 AM, William Bulley wrote:
> > I have Perl 5.14 compiled from source.
> > I have apache 2.2.19 ?compiled from source.
> > I have mod_perl2 2.0.5 compiled from source (with these patches):
>
> Can you pull 2.0.6-de
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 3:20 PM, William Bulley wrote:
> Recall that all I'm trying to do at this point is to get the apache
> server up and running. The fact that these two lines in this include
> file of this particular application case "apachectl -t" to error out
> should have nothing to do wi
According to Perrin Harkins on Fri, 06/17/11 at 14:24:
>
> Have you tried making a startup.pl and calling these from there with use() ?
Recall that all I'm trying to do at this point is to get the apache
server up and running. The fact that these two lines in this include
file of this particula
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:18 PM, William Bulley wrote:
> Others have suggested that I strip the parameters - I did and no change.
>
> Others suggested I place the module(s) invocation inside (the existing)
> ... tags - I did and no change. Go figure?
Have you tried making a startup.pl and callin
According to Perrin Harkins on Fri, 06/17/11 at 13:44:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:34 PM, William Bulley wrote:
> > ? PerlModule "Apache2::Const -compile => ':common'"
> > ? PerlModule "APR::Const -compile => ':common'"
>
> That syntax used to work? It seems unlikely. I've never seen a
> Pe
According to "James B. Muir" on Fri, 06/17/11 at
13:29:
>
> Have you checked the permissions on the Const.pm module?
freebsd% ls -l /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/mach/APR/Const.pm \
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/mach/Apache2/Const.pm \
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0/mach/
According to Fred Moyer on Fri, 06/17/11 at 13:43:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:29 AM, William Bulley wrote:
> > I have Perl 5.14 compiled from source.
> > I have apache 2.2.19 ?compiled from source.
> > I have mod_perl2 2.0.5 compiled from source (with these patches):
>
> Can you pull 2.0.6-d
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:34 PM, William Bulley wrote:
> PerlModule "Apache2::Const -compile => ':common'"
> PerlModule "APR::Const -compile => ':common'"
That syntax used to work? It seems unlikely. I've never seen a
PerlModule call with options like this before. I'd expect it to work
wi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:29 AM, William Bulley wrote:
> I have Perl 5.14 compiled from source.
> I have apache 2.2.19 compiled from source.
> I have mod_perl2 2.0.5 compiled from source (with these patches):
Can you pull 2.0.6-dev from svn and build?
http://perl.apache.org/download/source.htm
According to Torsten F?rtsch on Fri, 06/17/11 at
13:13:
>
> On Friday, June 17, 2011 18:34:07 William Bulley wrote:
> > Something in apache2 or
> > mod_perl2 or their APIs has changed, perhaps related to the newish
> > Perl 5.14 version.
>
> That may be the reason. 5.14 required some changes in
On Friday, June 17, 2011 18:34:07 William Bulley wrote:
> Something in apache2 or
> mod_perl2 or their APIs has changed, perhaps related to the newish
> Perl 5.14 version.
That may be the reason. 5.14 required some changes in the code. One half
of them went into modperl 2.0.5. It made 5.14rc2 com
According to Fred Moyer on Thu, 06/16/11 at 13:56:
>
> Hmm, odd that it wouldn't work under 2.0.5 but it would under 2.0.4.
I have spent some time today looking at the change logs for both
mod_perl2 and apache2 to see what, if anything, might point to a
change that could have produced my current
On 15/06/11 10:01 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
I'm interested in hearing about what application frameworks (Catalyst,
CGI::App, Mojolicious) are used here with mod_perl.
We currently support an open source corporate CMS called Metapoint
http://www.metapointcms.com (derived from Metadot, derived from
t
Le jeudi 16 juin 2011 à 14:11 -0700, Joe Schaefer a écrit :
>
> To me writing to a generic webserver API is not all that exciting.
> Python people love it, but they've never had a proper exposure
> to httpd in the first place. Yes it means you gain some portability,
> but the downside is that yo
I had 8-9 apps running as custom mp2 modules (not really in any
framework.) I did a few things in Catalyst, but it never really lit
my candle. Perlbal for reverse proxy. I used Postgres a lot, but
eventually realized that sqlite3 was good enough for what I was doing
most of the time.
Of late, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
