On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> I'm interested in hearing about what application frameworks (Catalyst,
> CGI::App, Mojolicious) are used here with mod_perl.
We have a lot of code using CGI::App as well as a mix of in-house
custom frameworks (old legacy stuff that goes back 8
Hi Fred,
I use mod_perl on a custom built framework written back in 2005
Performance of mod_perl has never been an issue, internal authenication
and network speed are more issues.
This runs on an intranet and services around 5000 users
Regards
Greg George
From: Fred Moyer
To: mod_perl
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Michael Peters wrote:
> I'd like to see the performance of Starman vs
> mod_perl for normal applications (that don't need to do anything fancy with
> Apache). If it's anywhere close to mod_perl than I suspect lots of people
> would use it instead since it's much ea
- Original Message
> From: Fred Moyer
> To: Joe Schaefer
> Cc: mod_perl list
> Sent: Thu, June 16, 2011 5:01:49 PM
> Subject: Re: How do you use mod_perl for your web application?
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Sigh. The big win with mod_perl2 is you ge
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Sigh. The big win with mod_perl2 is you get to interface with the rest
> of the C modules for httpd, often via subrequests. At the ASF we've
> been running mod_perl2 as our frontline mailserver for over 5y
This is Apache2::Qpsmtpd right? N
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> Maybe I'm not completely grokking how people are starting new projects
> using Plack, but it seems like the way to go is to not use Plack
> itself to write the code, but to use one of the many web frameworks
> (Mason2, Catalyst, Mojolicious) and
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Fred Moyer
>> To: Perrin Harkins
>> Cc: David E. Wheeler ; mod_perl list
>>
>> Sent: Thu, June 16, 2011 4:18:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: How do you use mod_perl for your web application?
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> > On Thu,
- Original Message
> From: Fred Moyer
> To: Perrin Harkins
> Cc: David E. Wheeler ; mod_perl list
>
> Sent: Thu, June 16, 2011 4:18:17 PM
> Subject: Re: How do you use mod_perl for your web application?
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2
On 06/16/2011 04:18 PM, Fred Moyer wrote:
Maybe I'm not completely grokking how people are starting new projects
using Plack, but it seems like the way to go is to not use Plack
itself to write the code, but to use one of the many web frameworks
(Mason2, Catalyst, Mojolicious) and then use Plack
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Daniel Risacher wrote:
> Of late, I've been wanting to go to PSGI or node.js, but I haven't
> taken the plunge yet. Many of my mod_perl apps relied on client-side
> PKI and SSL renegotiation, which I don't think can be done in PSGI,
> (or at least not well) and mo
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, David E. Wheeler
> wrote:
>> Whatever old man!
>
> I know, it's just a reality of working on applications that have been
> around for years. These tools are so reliable that they tend to stick
> around. I
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:07 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Whatever old man!
I know, it's just a reality of working on applications that have been
around for years. These tools are so reliable that they tend to stick
around. If I started something new I would probably use Plack, since
I've enjo
On Jun 16, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Fred Moyer wrote:
>> I'm interested in hearing about what application frameworks (Catalyst,
>> CGI::App, Mojolicious) are used here with mod_perl.
>
> Mason 1.x on mod_perl 1.x and apache 1.x, baby!
Whatever
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:01 AM, Fred Moyer wrote:
> I'm interested in hearing about what application frameworks (Catalyst,
> CGI::App, Mojolicious) are used here with mod_perl.
Mason 1.x on mod_perl 1.x and apache 1.x, baby!
- Perrin
According to Fred Moyer on Thu, 06/16/11 at 13:56:
>
> Hmm, odd that it wouldn't work under 2.0.5 but it would under 2.0.4.
My point exactly... :-(
> No idea why offhand. Do you use a startup.pl in your application?
No. The application's URL points to a directory with Mason laden HTML
file
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:28 AM, William Bulley wrote:
> The httpd.conf file is unchanged and was working since from before
> the upgrade.
>
> In the /usr/local/etc/apache22/httpd.conf file are these lines among
> several hundred other lines:
>
> LoadModule perl_module libexec/apache22/mod_perl.
I'm not sure this is the best place to ask about this problem, and
this is my first posting to this mailing list. I have already asked
the freebsd-questions mailing list about this, but have received no
replies as of this writing.
I'm running FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 9 09:25:05 EDT 2011 on
> I'm interested in hearing about what application frameworks (Catalyst,
> CGI::App, Mojolicious) are used here with mod_perl.
Currently, I use plain mod_perl2 2.0.4 with apache2 for a project about 10k
LOC on the web side and about 32k application's LOC.
I would like to know a better framework
On 06/16/2011 12:01 AM, Fred Moyer wrote:
I'll start. I have a couple of Apache::Dispatch based applications I
wrote. I also work on an Apache::ASP large codebase, and a couple of
different Catalyst based systems. All are running on mod_perl 2.0.4
in production (the ops haven't upgraded to 2.
19 matches
Mail list logo
