On 02/24/2011 03:31 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I wonder if someone here can give me a clue as to where to look...
If you have a fairly recent CGI.pm, it will decode utf-8 properly for
you (even avoiding double-decoding), but there are some caveats. In
addition to what others have already
Please download, test, and report back. Changes include a change to
the unshared size measurement. See the thread here for details -
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/modperl/modperl/102674
http://people.apache.org/~phred/Apache-SizeLimit-0.96-rc1.tar.gz
MD5 (Apache-SizeLimit-0.96-rc1.tar.gz
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 03:28:19 +1100, Daniel Manley
wrote:
I've been digging around in my mod_perl-based apps and trying to figure
out why setting up the DB connections for pinging is still randomly
producing first-thing-in-the-morning "mysql server has gone away"
errors. I read up about
Michael Peters wrote:
On 02/24/2011 04:31 PM, André Warnier wrote:
I wonder if someone here can give me a clue as to where to look...
The CGI.pm documentation talks about the -utf8 import flag which is
probably what you're looking for. But it does caution not to use it for
anything that nee
FWIW, with CGI.pm I always iterate through the params and Encode::decode with
the appropriate encoding with an exception for anything binary. (file uploads
etc)
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:31 PM
To: mod_perl list
S
Hi André,
There is a perlmonks post from a few years ago that explains one way
of automating this with CGI.pm. I've used this for several years now
without problems.
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=651574
Just remember that decoding params is just one part of dealing with
utf-8. You need to
On 02/24/2011 04:31 PM, André Warnier wrote:
I wonder if someone here can give me a clue as to where to look...
The CGI.pm documentation talks about the -utf8 import flag which is
probably what you're looking for. But it does caution not to use it for
anything that needs to do file uploads.
Hi.
I wonder if someone here can give me a clue as to where to look...
I am using
Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) DAV/2 SVN/1.5.1 mod_jk/1.2.26 PHP/5.2.6-1+lenny9 with Suhosin-Patch
mod_ssl/2.2.9 OpenSSL/0.9.8g mod_apreq2-20051231/2.6.0 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.0
perl -MCGI -e 'print $CGI::VERSION'
3.
Jonathan Swartz wrote:
Also, I realize now that "first major version in ten years" was a potentially
misleading choice of words. Mason was actively developed until 2006, and has had
maintenance releases since then. It's just that 1.00 was released ten years ago.
Hi.
I do not really know Mas
On 24 Feb 2011, at 15:44, Fred Moyer wrote:
> 2011/2/24 Torsten Förtsch :
>> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:27:42 Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>>> What's the rough ETA before this makes it to CPAN?
>>
>> end of April, perhaps.
>
> We can release this earlier than 2.0.6 if there are enough testers
2011/2/24 Torsten Förtsch :
> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:27:42 Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
>> What's the rough ETA before this makes it to CPAN?
>
> end of April, perhaps.
We can release this earlier than 2.0.6 if there are enough testers to
give feedback.
On 02/24/2011 05:47 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Oh, maybe Proc::Processtable is what you want.
Ah, no, it doesn't work on Win32 as far as I can tell. (Working on
Win32 is one of my requirements.) SizeLimit is the only module I've been
able to find that can reliably determine process size a
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Manley wrote:
> well, I think I figured this one out on my own. Though I've used Perl for a
> number of years, I've never gotten to the XS file coding. and so after
> running this under perl debug, I finally get the hint that maybe the mysql
> ping() is do
Hi Max,
I see a couple of things out there, like Memory::Usage. They don't
look as comprehensive though. It would be fine to take code from
SizeLimit if you want to put it into some other module. It should
probably be distributed outside of mod_perl to make it useful in the
way you're describin
Oh, maybe Proc::Processtable is what you want.
- Perrin
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Hi Max,
>
> I see a couple of things out there, like Memory::Usage. They don't
> look as comprehensive though. It would be fine to take code from
> SizeLimit if you want to put it i
Also, I realize now that "first major version in ten years" was a potentially
misleading choice of words. Mason was actively developed until 2006, and has
had maintenance releases since then. It's just that 1.00 was released ten years
ago.
On Feb 24, 2011, at 2:49 AM, xiaolan wrote:
> oops is
Four years ago, Amazon.com was completing a huge conversion to a new site
platform including Mason as the primary templating language. While they may be
moving away from it in newer development, I'd have to guess a substantial part
of the site still uses it. They still mention Mason in many curr
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:49 AM, xiaolan wrote:
> oops is there any big player using Mason these days?
Amazon.com. And this list is probably dated, but I'm sure some of
them still exist: http://masonhq.com/?MasonPoweredSites
I work on some sites using Mason, including MoveOn.org, ONE.org, and
c
Lovefilm big enough for you?
On 24 Feb 2011, at 10:49, xiaolan wrote:
> oops is there any big player using Mason these days?
>
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
>> In case any of you Mason users on the mod_perl list aren't on the Mason
>> list...
>>
>> - Perrin
>>
>>
On Thursday, February 24, 2011 11:27:42 Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
> What's the rough ETA before this makes it to CPAN?
end of April, perhaps.
Torsten Förtsch
--
Need professional modperl support? Hire me! (http://foertsch.name)
Like fantasy? http://kabatinte.net
oops is there any big player using Mason these days?
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> In case any of you Mason users on the mod_perl list aren't on the Mason
> list...
>
> - Perrin
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jonathan Swartz
> Date: Mon, Feb 21, 2
What's the rough ETA before this makes it to CPAN?
Working out if I want to add the patch to our build process or not...
On 24 Feb 2011, at 08:41, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 09:29:23 Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
>> On 02/23/2011 11:40 PM, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
>>> On
On 02/24/2011 12:41 AM, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> Max, could you please check if the following patch does what you want and try
> it out in your environment?
Hey Torsten. Yes, I tested it and it works. Thank you so much! :-)
-Max
--
http://www.bugzillasource.com/
Competent, Frien
Hey folks. Would it be possible to factor the memory-sizing code in
Apache::SizeLimit::Core into a separate module (or is there already a
separate module that does something similar)? I'd love a module that can
just reliably tell me how much memory a process is using across all
platforms.
On Thursday, February 24, 2011 09:29:23 Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 11:40 PM, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> > On Thursday, February 24, 2011 07:45:29 Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
> >> Hey Fred. So given the discussion that we've had on this, do you
> >> think that the next version of S
On 02/23/2011 11:40 PM, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 07:45:29 Max Kanat-Alexander wrote:
>> Hey Fred. So given the discussion that we've had on this, do you think
>> that the next version of SizeLimit could change its Linux behavior to
>> return the more appropriate
26 matches
Mail list logo
