Re: session module

Haven't used any of the popular session modules in awhile. Are these susceptible to the cleartext cookie silliness exposed by FireSheep? "Great Artists Ship" Lon Koenig l...@schnoggo.com http://lonk.me On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Jeff Pang wrote: > 于 2010-10-2

Re: mod_perl 1.30 seg faults

Hi Brian, That bug was fixed in mod_perl 1.31. Sure you can upgrade to last 1.x mod_perl. Regards. Salvador Ortiz. On 10/29/2010 02:50 PM, Brian Hirt wrote: I'm running a modperl installation with 1.30 and apache 1.3.42. I recently upgrade from Ubuntu 9.04 to Ubuntu 10.04 and now every time

Re: session module

--- On Fri, 10/29/10, Fayland Lam wrote: > try Dancer. which is very suitable > for small application. just one file. One file containing: """ use Dancer::Config; use Dancer::FileUtils; use Dancer::GetOpt; use Dancer::Error; use Dancer::Helpers; use Dancer::Logger; use Dancer::Plugin; use Dancer:

mod_perl 1.30 seg faults

I'm running a modperl installation with 1.30 and apache 1.3.42. I recently upgrade from Ubuntu 9.04 to Ubuntu 10.04 and now every time a mod perl process shuts, it dumps core. None of the application code changed. Maybe modperl isn't playing nicely with perl 5.10.1 (the old machine had 5.10

Re: [mp2] Test failures with new Perls (patch included)

Can you pull the latest svn trunk and test against that version? 2.0.4 is about two years old and has several fixes applied to it. http://perl.apache.org/download/source.html On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Doug Schrag wrote: > -8<-- Start Bug Report 8<-

Re: session module

于 2010-10-29 20:42, Fayland Lam 写道: try Dancer. which is very suitable for small application. just one file. Ok I will check out it. I first time knew Dancer from ruby 2 years ago. Never know that there is a perl execution of that.

Re: session module

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Jeff Pang wrote: > I know CGI::Session well. > But have been thinking does Apache::Session get better performance under > modperl? I haven't measured it, but I doubt there's any significant performance difference. Don't be fooled by the "CGI" in CGI::Session. -

Re: session module

try Dancer. which is very suitable for small application. just one file. Thanks On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Jeff Pang wrote: > 于 2010-10-29 20:28, Fayland Lam 写道: >> >> try a framework. that's much more popular. :) >> > > I wrote a small application with few scripts. > A framework like cata

Re: session module

于 2010-10-29 20:20, Perrin Harkins 写道: Both work. CGI::Session was better maintained for a while but it looks like Apache::Session has been updated recently. Pick the one that you find easiest to understand from the documentation. I know CGI::Session well. But have been thinking does Apache:

Re: session module

于 2010-10-29 20:28, Fayland Lam 写道: try a framework. that's much more popular. :) I wrote a small application with few scripts. A framework like catalyst is too large to use for me. Thanks. Jeff.

Re: session module

try a framework. that's much more popular. :) On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote: > Both work.  CGI::Session was better maintained for a while but it > looks like Apache::Session has been updated recently.  Pick the one > that you find easiest to understand from the documentati

Re: session module

Both work. CGI::Session was better maintained for a while but it looks like Apache::Session has been updated recently. Pick the one that you find easiest to understand from the documentation. - Perrin 2010/10/29 Jeff Pang : > is Apache::Session or CGI::Session better for mod_perl? > > Thanks. >