I'm connecting against oracle. So for every request it establish the
connection and it remains stable even though the request
has been completed successfully .
-Raja
-Original Message-
From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:da...@kineticode.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 11:03 PM
To: K
Well, I didn't make the changes myself - they were done by Datapipe staff
who
run a server for me. The route taken was extreme - they basically
de-installed all packages
and reinstalled. There may be better ways to go about it.
Joe N.
- Original Message -
From: "Foo JH"
To: "Joe Niederb
Hello Joe,
Do you think you can post the changes that need to be made here, for us
to reference when we hit the same problem?
Thanks.
Joe Niederberger wrote:
Thanks to everyone who contributed their insights to this thread - I
did get in touch with Mr. Galucci - and he did help straighten ou
On Nov 10, 2009, at 9:19 AM, Kulasekaran, Raja wrote:
> I'm using Apache::DBI and DBI->connect (persistence connection)
>
> So, Do I need to call $dbh->disconnect() for each child to close the
> connection ?
No, because Apache::DBI turns it into a no-op.
Apache::DBI is a very weird beast, with
I'm using Apache::DBI and DBI->connect (persistence connection)
So, Do I need to call $dbh->disconnect() for each child to close the
connection ?
Raja .
-Original Message-
From: David E. Wheeler [mailto:da...@kineticode.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:43 PM
To: Artem Kuchin
On Nov 10, 2009, at 7:04 AM, Artem Kuchin wrote:
> You mean each child process creates a new database CONNECTION (not process) ?
> The process is just one multhreaded mysql. But this is exactly what i want. I
> do not want any
> connection sharing because of the locking issues (lock tables). But
Kulasekaran, Raja:
It's like each child process create a new database process and it
remains stable. Instead of establishing a database connection, there is
a possibility to share the connection between the child threads using
sqlrelay (http://sqlrelay.sourceforge.net/ ). But I have no idea abou
