As a side note, my problems were on CentOS. But the errors were similar ...
Dimitri
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Sin wrote:
> When I build from ports the " make config " usually brings up a window
> that has options for both 32 bit and 64 bit. If I had to guess I'd say its
> the same M
remove my email from list.
Thanks and regards,
Sudhakar Avirneni,
ph)6786228961
> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:48:05 -0400
> Subject: Re: mod-perl child process
> From: phark...@gmail.com
> To: raja.kulaseka...@netapp.com
> CC: modperl@perl.apache.org
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Kula
The man you want at the FreeBSD lists is Philip M. Gollucci.
He maintains libapreq2 in the ports collection, and was very
helpful to me when I was trying to get the module to build,
earlier this year.
Good Luck and please report your results to this list when this is
settled,
cmac
On Oct 30,
When I build from ports the " make config " usually brings up a window that has
options for both 32 bit and 64 bit. If I had to guess I'd say its the same
Makefile and source code that builds the binary files. Or in your case a 64
bit bin file. But honestly I really don't know, we should s
This may be completely unrelated, but I had similar headaches installing
libapreq2 on a 64 bit machine that had both 32 and 64 bit libs installed. I
had to uninstall the offending 32 bit libs (which I didn't need).
Do they have a similar setup?
Dimitri
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Sin wro
pkg_add -r just goes to a package repository and gets a package version
thats allready complied for your distribution. So you can't build your
options.
However this apreq2.12 issue is interesting. I was going to try this
again. I went to build this port but make errored out with:
===>
Just a thought: is install ap22 + mp2 + libapreq2 via pkg_add -r an
option? That's what I normally do these days.
Adam Prime wrote:
You guys might want to take a look at this thread on apreq-dev
http://marc.info/?t=12420765987&r=1&w=2
Specifically the last couple of posts from pgollucci
