Hello,
One of our customers run a small site (about 3000 IP each day),
written with Perl CGI originally.
Now to expand some features and improve the performance, they want to
upgrade the site.
So do you think which is better that it will be re-written with pure
modperl (for example, using Mason),
You can find changes about graceful restarts in many of the
version release notes in apache2. My memory is that 2.2.11
was OK for me.
Letter -Os means "optimize for size":
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-2.95.3/gcc_2.html#SEC10
is the oldest gcc manual I could find, so the option has been
ar
> You are 4 releases behind. Download 2.2.13 and I bet graceful will
> work for you. (Bet's off if you have something systemically difficult
> w/r/t ssl.)
It appears that you may be right:
Changes with Apache 2.2.12
*) prefork: Fix child process hang during graceful restart/stop in
confi
On Sep 26, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
I'm using apache 2.2.9, mod_ssl 2.2.9 and mod_perl 2.04, and I still
have problems with graceful-restart.
You are 4 releases behind. Download 2.2.13 and I bet graceful will
work for you. (Bet's off if you have something systemically difficu
I would like to thank everyone for the very useful information. I have
gotten everything to work well. Also, the diverse views have given me
more options to try.
I am new to this 'web thing', having done system level programming for
over 30 years. I am trying to learn the various strategies and th
> But at some point, several iterative fixes by the Apache crew had
> succeeded such that 'apachectl graceful' worked better than my
> 'graceful' script in some way.
>
> It was sufficiently long ago that I've forgotten in what way, but the
> memory is clear enough that I think Messrs. Swart
On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
As I understand it, the sole purpose of this double initialization
is to make sure that graceful restarts will work. However, since I
was a young mod_perl lad I've been taught never to rely on graceful
restarts, and always to stop/start.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Mike Barborak wrote:
> I think I see what you're saying. It seems like a very expensive
> problem to solve. It must be a barrier to people choosing mod_perl to
> develop their apps because it might be the case that their
> distribution and installation process is m
