On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Clinton Gormley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Peters' comment about memory reuse was saying that:
> - if at runtime, you load a large memory structure
> - then let those variables go out of scope
> - then that memory will be come available for reuse by Perl
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:32 AM, André Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And they do "remember" some things between consecutive runs of scripts
> or modules. That is usually undesirable, because it can give nasty
> errors : a variable that you declare with "my $var" and that you expect
> to be
On 25.10.2008 13:34 Clinton Gormley wrote:
> I think there was some confusion here about what was being said.
>
> Michael Peters' comment about memory reuse was saying that:
> - if at runtime, you load a large memory structure
> - then let those variables go out of scope
> - then that memory w
Hi.
If stat returns 777 (octal), protection returns 0x777 (hexadecimal). The
documentaion claiming this as the same value should be fixed.
Sincerely,
Joachim
Michael Lackhoff wrote:
On 24.10.2008 15:03 Michael Peters wrote:
This is only true if those structures were created during run time and go out of scope at run time.
If they are generated at compile time or attached to global variables or package level variables,
they will not be re-used by Pe
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 05:59 +0200, Michael Lackhoff wrote:
> On 24.10.2008 15:03 Michael Peters wrote:
>
> > This is only true if those structures were created during run time and go
> > out of scope at run time.
> > If they are generated at compile time or attached to global variables or
> > p
