Re: framework for modperl applications

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP > applications? http://perl.apache.org/products/app-server.html - Perrin

Re: persistent database connection - Apache::DBI with mod_perl

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Chris Zhuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But how to setup Komodo 3.1 to debug mod_perl? You should probably ask the Komodo support list about that. Apache::DB seems to be working. - Perrin

Re: mod_proxy_html (reverse proxy) functionality for Apache 1

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Jim Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there any other solutions for Apache 1 before I start hacking on this > module? The Apache::Filter stuff does work, but I don't see any advantage to using that in this case. You'd still have to do the proxy fetch yourse

Re: Problem getting started

On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:21 AM, John M. Dlugosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, when I defined $r as you did, it worked. For documentation, I was > looking at here: > Hi John, That SYNOPSIS is more like a set of p

Re: framework for modperl applications

I like Mason a lot (HTML::Mason). We use Mason mostly for it's component execution chain, attributes, subexec, and a few other features. Also, we don't use Mason's template features at all, we choose to use HTML::Template for that. My $0.02, - Jeff - Original Message From: "[EMAIL PR

Re: framework for modperl applications

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Catalyst is big because of all the things it can do. If you want all of that stuff for free you need a big framework. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? I prefer CGI::Applic

Re: framework for modperl applications

Most will argue that it's not considered a framework per se, but I like HTML::Template. It's more of a templating engine really. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --pe

Re: framework for modperl applications

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Fred Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. >> Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP >> applications? >> thanks. My understanding is that Catalyst is as light as y

Re: framework for modperl applications

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny Apache::Dispatch (http://search.cpan.org/dist/Apache-Dispatch) is on lightweight end of the spectrum, one step removed from

Re: framework for modperl applications

Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2008 17:52:58 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. > Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP > applications? > thanks. > > --penny I'm using HTML::Mason and MasonX::WebApp along with DBIx::Class as the main p

framework for modperl applications

I found that Catalyst is too huge to use. Other than Catalyst, do you have any other framework suggested for MP applications? thanks. --penny