In the example at:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/
server.html#C_PerlPostConfigHandler_
the PerlPostConfigHandler subroutine returns Apache2::Const::OK.
I was wondering if it mattered what it returned, and if so, what are
the alternatives?
Just curious really...
-bop
On Nov 8, 2007, at 1:40 PM, John ORourke wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight,
easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus
will handle your vanilla
FLAME WAR!!!1!1!
well its not meant to flame... your options are this:
a)
Hi.
To fix a problem with headers appearing above an included (SSI) script
(PerlRun) I would like to turn off chunked encoding from inside the
script or from a fixup handler. How do I do this?
Sincerely,
Joachim
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
>> But what if the module Module::Name "use" or "require" other modules?
>> Are they also loaded before the server forks, or I need to load them
>> with "PerlModule ..." in httpd.conf?
>
> Good question. I think it might depend on how the requires/uses are scoped
> in th
On Nov 8, 2007, at 1:07 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
From: "Boysenberry Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What should I do if I want to load the classes after the server
forks?
There are many phases after the fork, the most commonly used is the
PerlResponseHandler phase
Do I understand correctly
From: "Boysenberry Payne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What should I do if I want to load the classes after the server forks?
There are many phases after the fork, the most commonly used is the
PerlResponseHandler phase
Do I understand correctly that even the modules specified in httpd.conf with
Perl
From: "John ORourke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Seriously though, it looks as though there are 5-10 good front end server
options which support the following to various degrees:
- reverse proxy
- caching
- load balancing
- static file serving
There is no clear choice since our setups range from singl
On Nov 8, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
Hi,
Can you please tell me when the server forks?
As indicated here:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/handlers/server.html
Basically, the server starts then parses the configuration script
(all pre mod_perl).
The fist phase we have
Octavian Rasnita wrote:
At the address
http://www.guindilla.eu/blog/2006/12/31/deployement-nginx-reverse-proxy-my-network/
I found the text below. Does anyone know if it is still true?
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everythi
At the address
http://www.guindilla.eu/blog/2006/12/31/deployement-nginx-reverse-proxy-my-network/
I found the text below. Does anyone know if it is still true?
Squid and Apache were discarded because too heavy. I did not want another
performance hole in my already strained server.
Pound does
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:58:35 -0500
Jim Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While some of the things you mention (caching, etc.) can be a purpose
> for the reverse proxy server, the key reason is to provide a buffer
> for all of the communication bits with clients that are not related
> to process
Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus will
handle your vanilla static files and even use fcgi to handle php and
other stuff
Reading these responses I think a generic config is
On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:50 AM, Clinton Gormley wrote:
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
configure, fast, stable, and makes the whole SSL and load balancing
dead
easy.
I can disagree -- nginx does everything that pound does, plus will
handle your vanilla s
> Although, I would go for something like pound doing the proxying for
> me, instead of mod_proxy
I can't agree more!
Pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/index_html) is light-weight, easy to
configure, fast, stable, and makes the whole SSL and load balancing dead
easy.
Pound++
Clint
14 matches
Mail list logo
